systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education

• DOI: 10.1016/J.HSAG.2015.08.002
• Corpus ID: 42402557

Systematic review as a research method in post-graduate nursing education

• W. Ham-Baloyi , P. Jordan
• Published 1 December 2016
• Education, Medicine
• Health Sa Gesondheid

Figures and Tables from this paper

53 Citations

Challenges in postgraduate research supervision in nursing education: integrative review., teaching evidence-based nursing practice: a systematic review and convergent qualitative synthesis., contributions of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to nursing education, research, and practice, the use of virtual mentoring with underrepresented minority groups in baccalaureate programs of nursing: a systematic review of the literature, the use of high-fidelity simulation (hfs) to teach clinical skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review, an international educational training course for conducting systematic reviews in health care: the joanna briggs institute's comprehensive systematic review training program, acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in europe.

• Highly Influenced

A systematic review exploring palliative care for families who are forced migrants.

A systematic review of the impact of the national health insurance scheme in nigeria, a systematic literature review of responsible leadership: challenges, outcomes and practices, 34 references, including systematic reviews in phd programmes and candidatures in nursing - 'hobson's choice', nursing research: an introduction, the practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, & utilization, revisiting qualitative inquiry: interviewing in nursing and midwifery research, cochrane systematic review as a phd thesis: an alternative with numerous advantages.

• Highly Influential

How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective

The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research, the integrative review: updated methodology., the librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study., methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

• Subscribe to journal Subscribe
• Get new issue alerts Get alerts
• Submit your manuscript

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

Systematic review methodology in graduate nursing education

Christian, Robin; Palokas, Michelle

UMMC School of Nursing Evidence Based Practice and Research Team: a Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Jackson, USA

Nursing educators have a responsibility to teach students how to apply current best practice principles to everyday clinical practice. However, this is a difficult challenge. In 2009, the number of published scholarly journal articles surpassed 50 million. 1 The increase in available information makes it difficult to keep up with research translation to clinical practice. As healthcare consumers expect providers to use the best evidence when providing care and treatments, rapid dissemination of medical information increases the demand for excellent health care, hence updates and advancement in nursing education are required. 2,3

In the United States (US), graduate nursing curriculum and competencies are dictated by multiple governing bodies. Nurses with higher degrees, such as Master's or Doctoral degrees, are taught to apply outcomes of research to solve clinical problems and disseminate the results to advance practice. 4 Doctoral programs in the US have two areas of focus, clinical practice (knowledge application) and research (knowledge generation). 3 The knowledge application degree is the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), and the knowledge generation degree is the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in nursing. The DNP competencies prepare graduates to practice at the highest clinical level and disseminate research findings into practice. 3 The DNP prepares nurses to apply appropriate knowledge in a specific setting with assessment, intervention and evaluation being key components to implementation and translation. 3 The PhD competencies prepare graduates in conducting scientific research and increasing empirical knowledge to improve healthcare and patient outcomes. 3 The skills needed for the PhD graduate are knowledge of relevant theory, research methodologies and statistical analysis. 3

Evidence-based practice concepts need to be included in graduate nursing education to provide the competencies and skills required for knowledge generation and application. Evidence-based practice competencies include clinical decision-making, critical thinking, problem identification and outcome measurement. 5 The four competencies are inherent in systematic review methodology. Systematic reviews use a rigorous and transparent method to provide an unbiased synthesis of multiple studies to answer a clinical question. 6

Systematic reviews are the gold standard of research syntheses and a critical element of informing nursing practice and the development of best practice guidelines. 6,7 Performing a systematic review is a highly qualified academic undertaking that requires comprehensive knowledge of research methodologies and analytical skills. 8 Teaching graduate nursing students to conduct a systematic review gives them hands-on application of evidence-based practice competencies to prepare them for real-world application and translation.

There is current evidence to support systematic reviews as a research method in graduate nursing education. 7 Due to the structure and rigorous steps required, there are many advantages in the learning experience of graduate students writing systematic reviews. The benefits include: pre-determined methods to identify and critically appraise relevant studies to answer a clearly articulated question, development of critical appraisal skills and critical thinking, opportunity to engage in a broad range of research methodologies, and no requirement of ethical approval due to the use of secondary data. 7 In the writing of a systematic review, the graduate student learns many skills such as excellent record keeping, abstract thinking, high computer literacy, literature searching skills for multiple databases, critical appraisal, and an understanding of diverse research methodologies. 7 The graduate student also has several publication opportunities with the completion of a systematic review.

The development of a systematic review is also an excellent opportunity for DNP and PhD students to work together. Collaboration between PhD researchers and DNP practitioners has been recommended as essential to furthering the nursing profession. 9 The systematic review process is an ideal mechanism to promote collaboration and collegiality between the two programs. By sharing knowledge and resources during the systematic review process, the PhD and DNP students further a unique but necessary dimension to nursing education.

Graduate nursing students need relevant knowledge and the tools to further nursing research as an integral part of evidence-based practice. 8 The systematic review process can provide the needed knowledge and tools. Health care will benefit most when nurses contribute to the summary and synthesis of research, therefore including the necessary methodological components in graduate curriculum is imperative. 6 By giving graduate nursing students the tools and knowledge needed for the generation and translation of research, we will be molding competent nursing leaders who can provide essential contributions in shaping the future of health care.

• Cited Here |
• PubMed | CrossRef |
• Google Scholar
• View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
• + Favorites
• View in Gallery

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Participatory research in mental health care services in low- and middle-income ..., development and delivery of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and..., interprofessional collaboration between health professional learners when..., strategies and indicators to integrate health equity in health service and..., ethical challenges faced by nurses during the covid-19 pandemic: a scoping....

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Learn more about DOAJ’s privacy policy.

Hide this message

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

The Directory of Open Access Journals

Quick search.

Health SA Gesondheid: Journal of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences (Oct 2016)

Systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education

• Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi,
• Portia Jordan

Affiliations

Read online

In South Africa, there appears to be poor understanding about using a systematic review as an acceptable research method in post-graduate nursing education. The lack of understanding may result in research supervisors being unable to guide post-graduate students, such as masters and doctoral students, in using the systematic review methodology in the completion of an academic qualification. Furthermore, they might not be able to assist post-graduate students in completing their studies, or conducting studies, in particular systematic reviews, which are of high quality. Valuable opportunities can thus be missed that might add to the body of knowledge to inform and improve research, education, and clinical practice. This article may set the field for an informed debate on systematic reviews as a useful and acceptable research method to be used by post-graduate nursing students in South Africa. We conclude that a systematic review could be a useful and acceptable method for research in post-graduate nursing education. However, the method's benefits and disadvantages should be considered before a post-graduate student embarks on such a journey.

• Critical interpretive synthesis
• Methodology
• Post-graduate nursing education
• Systematic review

WeChat QR code

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Systematic review methodology in graduate nursing education

Affiliation.

• 1 UMMC School of Nursing Evidence Based Practice and Research Team: a Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Jackson, USA.
• PMID: 29521855
• DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003704

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Use of national data sets to teach graduate students research skills. Abel E, Sherman JJ. Abel E, et al. West J Nurs Res. 1991 Dec;13(6):794-7. doi: 10.1177/019394599101300610. West J Nurs Res. 1991. PMID: 1836916 No abstract available.
• Online biostatistics: evidence-based curriculum for master's nursing education. Shillam CR, Ho G, Commodore-Mensah Y. Shillam CR, et al. J Nurs Educ. 2014 Apr;53(4):229-32. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140326-01. Epub 2014 Mar 26. J Nurs Educ. 2014. PMID: 24654693
• Redesigning a graduate research course for evidence-based competencies. Boyd MR, Baliko B, Herman J, Polyakova-Norwood V. Boyd MR, et al. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Nov;51(11):652-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120927-01. Epub 2012 Sep 27. J Nurs Educ. 2012. PMID: 23013065
• Nursing research education. Jamann-Riley JS. Jamann-Riley JS. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1990;8:177-91. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 1990. PMID: 2206625 Review. No abstract available.
• Simulation in nursing education. Lavoie P, Clarke SP. Lavoie P, et al. Nursing. 2017 Jul;47(7):18-20. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000520520.99696.9a. Nursing. 2017. PMID: 28640045 Review. No abstract available.
• Application of artificial intelligence in screening for adverse perinatal outcomes: A protocol for systematic review. Feduniw S, Sys D, Kwiatkowski S, Kajdy A. Feduniw S, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23681. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023681. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33327357 Free PMC article.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.
• Wolters Kluwer

Other Literature Sources

• scite Smart Citations

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.