two granddaughters when I get the chance!! I enjoy most
music except for Rap! I keep fit by jogging, walking, and bicycling(at least three times a week). I have travelled to many places and RVD the South-West U.S., but I would now like to find that special travel partner to do more travel to warm and interesting countries. I now feel it’s time to meet a nice, kind, honest woman who has some of the same interests as I do; to share the happy times, quiet times and adventures together.
Profile No. | Data Item | Initial Codes |
---|---|---|
2 | I enjoy photography, lapidary & seeking collectables in the form of classic movies & 33 1/3, 45 & 78 RPM recordings from the 1920s, ’30s & ’40s. I am retired & looking forward to travelling to Canada, the USA, the UK & Europe, China. I am unique since I do not judge a book by its cover. I accept people for who they are. I will not demand or request perfection from anyone until I am perfect, so I guess that means everyone is safe. My musical tastes range from Classical, big band era, early jazz, classic ’50s & 60’s rock & roll & country since its inception. | HobbiesFuture plans Travel Unique Values Humour Music |
At this stage, you have to make the themes. These themes should be categorised based on the codes. All the codes which have previously been generated should be turned into themes. Moreover, with the help of the codes, some themes and sub-themes can also be created. This process is usually done with the help of visuals so that a reader can take an in-depth look at first glance itself.
Now you have to take an in-depth look at all the awarded themes again. You have to check whether all the given themes are organised properly or not. It would help if you were careful and focused because you have to note down the symmetry here. If you find that all the themes are not coherent, you can revise them. You can also reshape the data so that there will be symmetry between the themes and dataset here.
For better understanding, a mind-mapping example is given here:
You need to review the themes after coding them. At this stage, you are allowed to play with your themes in a more detailed manner. You have to convert the bigger themes into smaller themes here. If you want to combine some similar themes into a single theme, then you can do it. This step involves two steps for better fragmentation.
You need to observe the coded data separately so that you can have a precise view. If you find that the themes which are given are following the dataset, it’s okay. Otherwise, you may have to rearrange the data again to coherence in the coded data.
Here you have to take into consideration all the corpus data again. It would help if you found how themes are arranged here. It would help if you used the visuals to check out the relationship between them. Suppose all the things are not done accordingly, so you should check out the previous steps for a refined process. Otherwise, you can move to the next step. However, make sure that all the themes are satisfactory and you are not confused.
When all the two steps are completed, you need to make a more précised mind map. An example following the previous cases has been given below:
Now you have to define all the themes which you have given to your data set. You can recheck them carefully if you feel that some of them can fit into one concept, you can keep them, and eliminate the other irrelevant themes. Because it should be precise and clear, there should not be any ambiguity. Now you have to think about the main idea and check out that all the given themes are parallel to your main idea or not. This can change the concept for you.
The given names should be so that it can give any reader a clear idea about your findings. However, it should not oppose your thematic analysis; rather, everything should be organised accurately.
If not, we can help. Our panel of experts makes sure to keep the 3 pillars of Research Methodology strong.
Also, read about discourse analysis , content analysis and survey conducting . we have provided comprehensive guides.
You need to make the final report of all the findings you have done at this stage. You should include the dataset, findings, and every aspect of your analysis in it.
While making the final report , do not forget to consider your audience. For instance, you are writing for the Newsletter, Journal, Public awareness, etc., your report should be according to your audience. It should be concise and have some logic; it should not be repetitive. You can use the references of other relevant sources as evidence to support your discussion.
What is meant by thematic analysis.
Thematic Analysis is a qualitative research method that involves identifying, analyzing, and interpreting recurring themes or patterns in data. It aims to uncover underlying meanings, ideas, and concepts within the dataset, providing insights into participants’ perspectives and experiences.
The authenticity of dissertation is largely influenced by the research method employed. Here we present the most notable research methods for dissertation.
Disadvantages of primary research – It can be expensive, time-consuming and take a long time to complete if it involves face-to-face contact with customers.
This article presents the key advantages and disadvantages of secondary research so you can select the most appropriate research approach for your study.
USEFUL LINKS
LEARNING RESOURCES
COMPANY DETAILS
Plain-Language Explanation & Definition (With Examples)
By: Jenna Crosley (PhD). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | April 2021
Thematic analysis is one of the most popular qualitative analysis techniques we see students opting for at Grad Coach – and for good reason. Despite its relative simplicity, thematic analysis can be a very powerful analysis technique when used correctly. In this post, we’ll unpack thematic analysis using plain language (and loads of examples) so that you can conquer your analysis with confidence.
Before we begin, let’s first lay down some terminology. When undertaking thematic analysis, you’ll make use of codes . A code is a label assigned to a piece of text, and the aim of using a code is to identify and summarise important concepts within a set of data, such as an interview transcript.
For example, if you had the sentence, “My rabbit ate my shoes”, you could use the codes “rabbit” or “shoes” to highlight these two concepts. The process of assigning codes is called qualitative coding . If this is a new concept to you, be sure to check out our detailed post about qualitative coding .
Codes are vital as they lay a foundation for themes . But what exactly is a theme? Simply put, a theme is a pattern that can be identified within a data set. In other words, it’s a topic or concept that pops up repeatedly throughout your data. Grouping your codes into themes serves as a way of summarising sections of your data in a useful way that helps you answer your research question(s) and achieve your research aim(s).
Alright – with that out of the way, let’s jump into the wonderful world of thematic analysis…
Thematic analysis is the study of patterns to uncover meaning . In other words, it’s about analysing the patterns and themes within your data set to identify the underlying meaning. Importantly, this process is driven by your research aims and questions , so it’s not necessary to identify every possible theme in the data, but rather to focus on the key aspects that relate to your research questions .
Although the research questions are a driving force in thematic analysis (and pretty much all analysis methods), it’s important to remember that these questions are not necessarily fixed . As thematic analysis tends to be a bit of an exploratory process, research questions can evolve as you progress with your coding and theme identification.
There are many potential qualitative analysis methods that you can use to analyse a dataset. For example, content analysis , discourse analysis , and narrative analysis are popular choices. So why use thematic analysis?
Thematic analysis is highly beneficial when working with large bodies of data , as it allows you to divide and categorise large amounts of data in a way that makes it easier to digest. Thematic analysis is particularly useful when looking for subjective information , such as a participant’s experiences, views, and opinions. For this reason, thematic analysis is often conducted on data derived from interviews , conversations, open-ended survey responses , and social media posts.
Your research questions can also give you an idea of whether you should use thematic analysis or not. For example, if your research questions were to be along the lines of:
These examples are all research questions centering on the subjective experiences of participants and aim to assess experiences, views, and opinions. Therefore, thematic analysis presents a possible approach.
In short, thematic analysis is a good choice when you are wanting to categorise large bodies of data (although the data doesn’t necessarily have to be large), particularly when you are interested in subjective experiences .
Broadly speaking, there are two overarching approaches to thematic analysis: inductive and deductive . The approach you take will depend on what is most suitable in light of your research aims and questions. Let’s have a look at the options.
The inductive approach involves deriving meaning and creating themes from data without any preconceptions . In other words, you’d dive into your analysis without any idea of what codes and themes will emerge, and thus allow these to emerge from the data.
For example, if you’re investigating typical lunchtime conversational topics in a university faculty, you’d enter the research without any preconceived codes, themes or expected outcomes. Of course, you may have thoughts about what might be discussed (e.g., academic matters because it’s an academic setting), but the objective is to not let these preconceptions inform your analysis.
The inductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are exploratory in nature , and cases where there is little existing research on the topic of interest.
In contrast to the inductive approach, a deductive approach involves jumping into your analysis with a pre-determined set of codes . Usually, this approach is informed by prior knowledge and/or existing theory or empirical research (which you’d cover in your literature review ).
For example, a researcher examining the impact of a specific psychological intervention on mental health outcomes may draw on an existing theoretical framework that includes concepts such as coping strategies, social support, and self-efficacy, using these as a basis for a set of pre-determined codes.
The deductive approach is best suited to research aims and questions that are confirmatory in nature , and cases where there is a lot of existing research on the topic of interest.
Regardless of whether you take the inductive or deductive approach, you’ll also need to decide what level of content your analysis will focus on – specifically, the semantic level or the latent level.
A semantic-level focus ignores the underlying meaning of data , and identifies themes based only on what is explicitly or overtly stated or written – in other words, things are taken at face value.
In contrast, a latent-level focus concentrates on the underlying meanings and looks at the reasons for semantic content. Furthermore, in contrast to the semantic approach, a latent approach involves an element of interpretation , where data is not just taken at face value, but meanings are also theorised.
“But how do I know when to use what approach?”, I hear you ask.
Well, this all depends on the type of data you’re analysing and what you’re trying to achieve with your analysis. For example, if you’re aiming to analyse explicit opinions expressed in interviews and you know what you’re looking for ahead of time (based on a collection of prior studies), you may choose to take a deductive approach with a semantic-level focus.
On the other hand, if you’re looking to explore the underlying meaning expressed by participants in a focus group, and you don’t have any preconceptions about what to expect, you’ll likely opt for an inductive approach with a latent-level focus.
Simply put, the nature and focus of your research, especially your research aims , objectives and questions will inform the approach you take to thematic analysis.
Now that you’ve got an understanding of the overarching approaches to thematic analysis, it’s time to have a look at the different types of thematic analysis you can conduct. Broadly speaking, there are three “types” of thematic analysis:
Let’s have a look at each of these:
Reflexive thematic analysis takes an inductive approach, letting the codes and themes emerge from that data. This type of thematic analysis is very flexible, as it allows researchers to change, remove, and add codes as they work through the data. As the name suggests, reflexive thematic analysis emphasizes the active engagement of the researcher in critically reflecting on their assumptions, biases, and interpretations, and how these may shape the analysis.
Reflexive thematic analysis typically involves iterative and reflexive cycles of coding, interpreting, and reflecting on data, with the aim of producing nuanced and contextually sensitive insights into the research topic, while at the same time recognising and addressing the subjective nature of the research process.
Codebook thematic analysis , on the other hand, lays on the opposite end of the spectrum. Taking a deductive approach, this type of thematic analysis makes use of structured codebooks containing clearly defined, predetermined codes. These codes are typically drawn from a combination of existing theoretical theories, empirical studies and prior knowledge of the situation.
Codebook thematic analysis aims to produce reliable and consistent findings. Therefore, it’s often used in studies where a clear and predefined coding framework is desired to ensure rigour and consistency in data analysis.
Coding reliability thematic analysis necessitates the work of multiple coders, and the design is specifically intended for research teams. With this type of analysis, codebooks are typically fixed and are rarely altered.
The benefit of this form of analysis is that it brings an element of intercoder reliability where coders need to agree upon the codes used, which means that the outcome is more rigorous as the element of subjectivity is reduced. In other words, multiple coders discuss which codes should be used and which shouldn’t, and this consensus reduces the bias of having one individual coder decide upon themes.
To recap, the two main approaches to thematic analysis are inductive , and deductive . Then we have the three types of thematic analysis: reflexive, codebook and coding reliability . Which type of thematic analysis you opt for will need to be informed by factors such as:
Now that we’ve covered the “what” in terms of thematic analysis approaches and types, it’s time to look at the “how” of thematic analysis.
At this point, you’re ready to get going with your analysis, so let’s dive right into the thematic analysis process. Keep in mind that what we’ll cover here is a generic process, and the relevant steps will vary depending on the approach and type of thematic analysis you opt for.
The first step in your thematic analysis involves getting a feel for your data and seeing what general themes pop up. If you’re working with audio data, this is where you’ll do the transcription , converting audio to text.
At this stage, you’ll want to come up with preliminary thoughts about what you’ll code , what codes you’ll use for them, and what codes will accurately describe your content. It’s a good idea to revisit your research topic , and your aims and objectives at this stage. For example, if you’re looking at what people feel about different types of dogs, you can code according to when different breeds are mentioned (e.g., border collie, Labrador, corgi) and when certain feelings/emotions are brought up.
As a general tip, it’s a good idea to keep a reflexivity journal . This is where you’ll write down how you coded your data, why you coded your data in that particular way, and what the outcomes of this data coding are. Using a reflexive journal from the start will benefit you greatly in the final stages of your analysis because you can reflect on the coding process and assess whether you have coded in a manner that is reliable and whether your codes and themes support your findings.
As you can imagine, a reflexivity journal helps to increase reliability as it allows you to analyse your data systematically and consistently. If you choose to make use of a reflexivity journal, this is the stage where you’ll want to take notes about your initial codes and list them in your journal so that you’ll have an idea of what exactly is being reflected in your data. At a later stage in the analysis, this data can be more thoroughly coded, or the identified codes can be divided into more specific ones.
Step 2! You’re going strong. In this step, you’ll want to look out for patterns or themes in your codes. Moving from codes to themes is not necessarily a smooth or linear process. As you become more and more familiar with the data, you may find that you need to assign different codes or themes according to new elements you find. For example, if you were analysing a text talking about wildlife, you may come across the codes, “pigeon”, “canary” and “budgerigar” which can fall under the theme of birds.
As you work through the data, you may start to identify subthemes , which are subdivisions of themes that focus specifically on an aspect within the theme that is significant or relevant to your research question. For example, if your theme is a university, your subthemes could be faculties or departments at that university.
In this stage of the analysis, your reflexivity journal entries need to reflect how codes were interpreted and combined to form themes.
By now you’ll have a good idea of your codes, themes, and potentially subthemes. Now it’s time to review all the themes you’ve identified . In this step, you’ll want to check that everything you’ve categorised as a theme actually fits the data, whether the themes do indeed exist in the data, whether there are any themes missing , and whether you can move on to the next step knowing that you’ve coded all your themes accurately and comprehensively . If you find that your themes have become too broad and there is far too much information under one theme, it may be useful to split this into more themes so that you’re able to be more specific with your analysis.
In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write about how you understood the themes and how they are supported by evidence, as well as how the themes fit in with your codes. At this point, you’ll also want to revisit your research questions and make sure that the data and themes you’ve identified are directly relevant to these questions .
By this point, your analysis will really start to take shape. In the previous step, you reviewed and refined your themes, and now it’s time to label and finalise them . It’s important to note here that, just because you’ve moved onto the next step, it doesn’t mean that you can’t go back and revise or rework your themes. In contrast to the previous step, finalising your themes means spelling out what exactly the themes consist of, and describe them in detail . If you struggle with this, you may want to return to your data to make sure that your data and coding do represent the themes, and if you need to divide your themes into more themes (i.e., return to step 3).
When you name your themes, make sure that you select labels that accurately encapsulate the properties of the theme . For example, a theme name such as “enthusiasm in professionals” leaves the question of “who are the professionals?”, so you’d want to be more specific and label the theme as something along the lines of “enthusiasm in healthcare professionals”.
It is very important at this stage that you make sure that your themes align with your research aims and questions . When you’re finalising your themes, you’re also nearing the end of your analysis and need to keep in mind that your final report (discussed in the next step) will need to fit in with the aims and objectives of your research.
In your reflexivity journal, you’ll want to write down a few sentences describing your themes and how you decided on these. Here, you’ll also want to mention how the theme will contribute to the outcomes of your research, and also what it means in relation to your research questions and focus of your research.
By the end of this stage, you’ll be done with your themes – meaning it’s time to write up your findings and produce a report.
You’re nearly done! Now that you’ve analysed your data, it’s time to report on your findings. A typical thematic analysis report consists of:
When writing your report, make sure that you provide enough information for a reader to be able to evaluate the rigour of your analysis. In other words, the reader needs to know the exact process you followed when analysing your data and why. The questions of “what”, “how”, “why”, “who”, and “when” may be useful in this section.
So, what did you investigate? How did you investigate it? Why did you choose this particular method? Who does your research focus on, and who are your participants? When did you conduct your research, when did you collect your data, and when was the data produced? Your reflexivity journal will come in handy here as within it you’ve already labelled, described, and supported your themes.
If you’re undertaking a thematic analysis as part of a dissertation or thesis, this discussion will be split across your methodology, results and discussion chapters . For more information about those chapters, check out our detailed post about dissertation structure .
It’s absolutely vital that, when writing up your results, you back up every single one of your findings with quotations . The reader needs to be able to see that what you’re reporting actually exists within the results. Also make sure that, when reporting your findings, you tie them back to your research questions . You don’t want your reader to be looking through your findings and asking, “So what?”, so make sure that every finding you represent is relevant to your research topic and questions.
Getting familiar with your data: Here you’ll read through your data and get a general overview of what you’re working with. At this stage, you may identify a few general codes and themes that you’ll make use of in the next step.
Search for patterns or themes in your codes : Here you’ll dive into your data and pick out the themes and codes relevant to your research question(s).
Review themes : In this step, you’ll revisit your codes and themes to make sure that they are all truly representative of the data, and that you can use them in your final report.
Finalise themes : Here’s where you “solidify” your analysis and make it report-ready by describing and defining your themes.
Produce your report : This is the final step of your thematic analysis process, where you put everything you’ve found together and report on your findings.
In the video below, we share 6 time-saving tips and tricks to help you approach your thematic analysis as effectively and efficiently as possible.
In this article, we’ve covered the basics of thematic analysis – what it is, when to use it, the different approaches and types of thematic analysis, and how to perform a thematic analysis.
If you have any questions about thematic analysis, drop a comment below and we’ll do our best to assist. If you’d like 1-on-1 support with your thematic analysis, be sure to check out our research coaching services here .
I really appreciate the help
Hello Sir, how many levels of coding can be done in thematic analysis? We generate codes from the transcripts, then subthemes from the codes and themes from subthemes, isn’t it? Should these themes be again grouped together? how many themes can be derived?can you please share an example of coding through thematic analysis in a tabular format?
I’ve found the article very educative and useful
Excellent. Very helpful and easy to understand.
This article so far has been most helpful in understanding how to write an analysis chapter. Thank you.
My research topic is the challenges face by the school principal on the process of procurement . Thematic analysis is it sutable fir data analysis ?
It is a great help. Thanks.
Best advice. Worth reading. Thank you.
Where can I find an example of a template analysis table ?
Finally I got the best article . I wish they also have every psychology topics.
Hello, Sir/Maam
I am actually finding difficulty in doing qualitative analysis of my data and how to triangulate this with quantitative data. I encountered your web by accident in the process of searching for a much simplified way of explaining about thematic analysis such as coding, thematic analysis, write up. When your query if I need help popped up, I was hesitant to answer. Because I think this is for fee and I cannot afford. So May I just ask permission to copy for me to read and guide me to study so I can apply it myself for my gathered qualitative data for my graduate study.
Thank you very much! this is very helpful to me in my Graduate research qualitative data analysis.
Thank you very much. I find your guidance here helpful. Kindly let help me understand how to write findings and discussions.
i am having troubles with the concept of framework analysis which i did not find here and i have been an assignment on framework analysis
I was discouraged and felt insecure because after more than a year of writing my thesis, my work seemed lost its direction after being checked. But, I am truly grateful because through the comments, corrections, and guidance of the wisdom of my director, I can already see the bright light because of thematic analysis. I am working with Biblical Texts. And thematic analysis will be my method. Thank you.
lovely and helpful. thanks
very informative information.
thank you very much!, this is very helpful in my report, God bless……..
Thank you for the insight. I am really relieved as you have provided a super guide for my thesis.
Thanks a lot, really enlightening
excellent! very helpful thank a lot for your great efforts
I am currently conducting a research on the Economic challenges to migrant integration. Using interviews to understand the challenges by interviewing professionals working with migrants. Wouks appreciate help with how to do this using the thematic approach. Thanks
The article cleared so many issues that I was not certain of. Very informative. Thank you.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Reference management. Clean and simple.
When is thematic analysis used, braun and clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis, 1. familiarizing, 2. generating initial codes, 3. generating themes, 4. reviewing themes, 5. defining and naming themes, 6. creating the report, the advantages and disadvantages of thematic analysis, disadvantages, frequently asked questions about thematic analysis, related articles.
Thematic analysis is a broad term that describes an approach to analyzing qualitative data . This approach can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. Learn more about different research methods.
A researcher performing a thematic analysis will study a set of data to pinpoint repeating patterns, or themes, in the topics and ideas that are expressed in the texts.
In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics. This requires an approach to data that is complex and exploratory and can be anchored by different philosophical and conceptual foundations.
A six-step system was developed to help establish clarity and rigor around this process, and it is this system that is most commonly used when conducting a thematic analysis. The six steps are:
It is important to note that even though the six steps are listed in sequence, thematic analysis is not necessarily a linear process that advances forward in a one-way, predictable fashion from step one through step six. Rather, it involves a more fluid shifting back and forth between the phases, adjusting to accommodate new insights when they arise.
And arriving at insight is a key goal of this approach. A good thematic analysis doesn’t just seek to present or summarize data. It interprets and makes a statement about it; it extracts meaning from the data.
Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge.
Some examples of research questions that thematic analysis can be used to answer are:
To begin answering these questions, you would need to gather data from participants who can provide relevant responses. Once you have the data, you would then analyze and interpret it.
Because you’re dealing with personal views and opinions, there is a lot of room for flexibility in terms of how you interpret the data. In this way, thematic analysis is systematic but not purely scientific.
A landmark 2006 paper by Victoria Braun and Victoria Clarke (“ Using thematic analysis in psychology ”) established parameters around thematic analysis—what it is and how to go about it in a systematic way—which had until then been widely used but poorly defined.
Since then, their work has been updated, with the name being revised, notably, to “reflexive thematic analysis.”
One common misconception that Braun and Clarke have taken pains to clarify about their work is that they do not believe that themes “emerge” from the data. To think otherwise is problematic since this suggests that meaning is somehow inherent to the data and that a researcher is merely an objective medium who identifies that meaning.
Conversely, Braun and Clarke view analysis as an interactive process in which the researcher is an active participant in constructing meaning, rather than simply identifying it.
The six stages they presented in their paper are still the benchmark for conducting a thematic analysis. They are presented below.
This step is where you take a broad, high-level view of your data, looking at it as a whole and taking note of your first impressions.
This typically involves reading through written survey responses and other texts, transcribing audio, and recording any patterns that you notice. It’s important to read through and revisit the data in its entirety several times during this stage so that you develop a thorough grasp of all your data.
After familiarizing yourself with your data, the next step is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.
In our example scenario, we’re researching the experiences of women over the age of 50 on professional networking social media sites. Interviews were conducted to gather data, with the following excerpt from one interview.
Interview snippet | Codes |
---|---|
It’s hard to get a handle on it. It’s so different from how things used to be done, when networking was about handshakes and business cards. | Confusion Comparison with old networking methods |
It makes me feel like a dinosaur. | Sense of being left behind |
Plus, I've been burned a few times. I'll spend time making what I think are professional connections with male peers, only for the conversation to unexpectedly turn romantic on me. It seems like a lot of men use these sites as a way to meet women, not to develop their careers. It's stressful, to be honest. | Discomfort and unease Unexpected experience with other users |
In the example interview snippet, portions have been highlighted and coded. The codes describe the idea or perception described in the text.
It pays to be exhaustive and thorough at this stage. Good practice involves scrutinizing the data several times, since new information and insight may become apparent upon further review that didn’t jump out at first glance. Multiple rounds of analysis also allow for the generation of more new codes.
Once the text is thoroughly reviewed, it’s time to collate the data into groups according to their code.
Now that we’ve created our codes, we can examine them, identify patterns within them, and begin generating themes.
Keep in mind that themes are more encompassing than codes. In general, you’ll be bundling multiple codes into a single theme.
To draw on the example we used above about women and networking through social media, codes could be combined into themes in the following way:
Codes | Theme |
---|---|
Confusion, Discomfort and unease, Unexpected experience with other users | Negative experience |
Comparison with old networking methods, Sense of being left behind | Perceived lack of skills |
You’ll also be curating your codes and may elect to discard some on the basis that they are too broad or not directly relevant. You may also choose to redefine some of your codes as themes and integrate other codes into them. It all depends on the purpose and goal of your research.
This is the stage where we check that the themes we’ve generated accurately and relevantly represent the data they are based on. Once again, it’s beneficial to take a thorough, back-and-forth approach that includes review, assessment, comparison, and inquiry. The following questions can support the review:
With your final list of themes in hand, the next step is to name and define them.
In defining them, we want to nail down the meaning of each theme and, importantly, how it allows us to make sense of the data.
Once you have your themes defined, you’ll need to apply a concise and straightforward name to each one.
In our example, our “perceived lack of skills” may be adjusted to reflect that the texts expressed uncertainty about skills rather than the definitive absence of them. In this case, a more apt name for the theme might be “questions about competence.”
To finish the process, we put our findings down in writing. As with all scholarly writing, a thematic analysis should open with an introduction section that explains the research question and approach.
This is followed by a statement about the methodology that includes how data was collected and how the thematic analysis was performed.
Each theme is addressed in detail in the results section, with attention paid to the frequency and presence of the themes in the data, as well as what they mean, and with examples from the data included as supporting evidence.
The conclusion section describes how the analysis answers the research question and summarizes the key points.
In our example, the conclusion may assert that it is common for women over the age of 50 to have negative experiences on professional networking sites, and that these are often tied to interactions with other users and a sense that using these sites requires specialized skills.
Thematic analysis is useful for analyzing large data sets, and it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. Moreover, it supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.
There are times when thematic analysis is not the best approach to take because it can be highly subjective, and, in seeking to identify broad patterns, it can overlook nuance in the data.
What’s more, researchers must be judicious about reflecting on how their own position and perspective bears on their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.
Thematic analysis offers a flexible and recursive way to approach qualitative data that has the potential to yield valuable insights about people’s opinions, views, and lived experience. It must be applied, however, in a conscientious fashion so as not to allow subjectivity to taint or obscure the results.
The purpose of thematic analysis is to find repeating patterns, or themes, in qualitative data. Thematic analysis can encompass diverse methods and is usually applied to a collection of texts, such as survey responses and transcriptions of interviews or focus group discussions. In analyzing qualitative data, thematic analysis focuses on concepts, opinions, and experiences, as opposed to pure statistics.
A big advantage of thematic analysis is that it allows a lot of flexibility in terms of designing theoretical and research frameworks. It also supports the generation and interpretation of themes that are backed by data.
A disadvantage of thematic analysis is that it can be highly subjective and can overlook nuance in the data. Also, researchers must be aware of how their own position and perspective influences their interpretations of the data and if they are imposing meaning that is not there or failing to pick up on meaning that is.
How many themes make sense in your thematic analysis of course depends on your topic and the material you are working with. In general, it makes sense to have no more than 6-10 broader themes, instead of having many really detailed ones. You can then identify further nuances and differences under each theme when you are diving deeper into the topic.
Since thematic analysis is used to study qualitative data, it works best in cases where you’re looking to gather information about people’s views, values, opinions, experiences, and knowledge. Therefore, it makes sense to use thematic analysis for interviews.
After familiarizing yourself with your data, the first step of a thematic analysis is coding notable features of the data in a methodical way. This often means highlighting portions of the text and applying labels, aka codes, to them that describe the nature of their content.
Table of contents, what is a thematic essay, how to pick a thematic topic, thematic essay research, writing a thematic statement, the outline: the thematic essay structure, thematic essay writing tips, getting professional thematic essay assistance.
When a writer creates a work, there’s often more to what they say than what is directly revealed in the storyline. Many great writers use their work to teach lessons, to show the results of human nature and behavior, even make a statement on society as a whole. To discover these themes takes critical reading. When you do see a writer’s hidden message, you’ve discovered their theme. Sharing what you’ve discovered with others is what you do when you write a thematic essay. That’s what this piece is about.
To answer this question, start with another question. What is a thematic statement? This is a statement, usually a few sentences, that describes the underlying theme being addressed in a piece of writing. A thematic statement can be used as the thesis in a thematic essay, This would then further explore how the writer furthers that theme in their work. For example, through the use of literary devices or moral tales.
A student who is assigned a thematic essay will be expected to reveal the theme, and then delve into the methods the writer uses to express the theme. They will also discuss the significance of the theme. The latter is often done with some sort of context. One example of this would be to examine a key theme in a written work within the context of the political climate at the time.
The biggest challenge in writing a thematic essay is in finding the right work upon which to base the essay.
It should be impactful and meaningful, and relevant to the course.
Unlike most other essay types, there are no absolutely right or wrong answers. Thematic essays are largely subjective. However, it is important that the writer is able to back up their assertions using logical arguments.
Thematic essays are largely subjective.
Writer144311.
Writer144311 has a background in marketing, technology, and business intelligence. S/he enjoys writing about data science, BI, new marketing trends and branding strategies. On TrustMyPaper s/he shares her practical experience through academic writing.
Before you can write a thematic essay, you have to select a theme that is relevant to the written work . There are two ways to approach this.
The first is to start with a written work. You can select a book that is personally meaningful to you. In some instances, the written work is chosen for you by your instructor. In these cases, it is up to you to extract the theme for your essay, to create the thematic statement, and write the essay. The second is to choose a theme first, then find a written work that best exemplifies that.
Here are some thematic statement examples to help you to choose a topic:
The role of poverty in Dickens Novels
Injustice and the death penalty
Colonialism and the development of the modern world
The benefit of hopefulness in Difficult Times
How honesty is important to children
If you need additional inspiration, look to thematic writing examples.
They will help you to uncover themes you may have never considered otherwise. You can also find essays written on works that you may not be familiar with.
You can also try listing some of your own, meaningful experiences . Keep in mind that many experiences are universal, and someone may have written about yours.
Of course, the first step is to read the written work thoroughly and take notes. You’ll want to note the literary devices used that describe the theme, and put forth the authors’ thoughts on the subject. You may have to dig deep, writers tend to use devices like allusion and foreshadowing. On the other hand, don’t ignore direct statements either.
You might also do some research outside of the written work itself. Start with the writer. What is their background? Have they articulated their beliefs in other ways? What was going on in the world at the time they wrote the piece you are reading? These things can contribute to the writer’s motivations, and explain why that theme was important to them.
Here, writing a theme statement is nearly the same as composing your thesis statement. You’ll perfect it a bit more as you write, but this will represent what you believe is the theme, and why. Try to be concise. You aren’t justifying it or supporting it at this point. You are simply stating it.
As with other essays, your outline will help you create a structure for your essay. It will also allow you to identify and lay out your main points. Finally, your outline will allow you to work on sequencing. This is important, as the sequence of your essay can make your points have more impact.
The exact structure and layout of your essay depend on the assignment. If the assignment rubric requires that you turn an essay into your instructor, you’ll want to use a traditional I, A, 1 format. If not, do whatever helps you to best organize your paper.
Here are the elements that you should cover in your essay:
The Intro: Here you will let readers know what written work your essay is based on, and present your thesis.
The Body Paragraphs: Anchor these with the main point that shares a detail about the theme, and back these with examples from the work as supporting points.
The Conclusion: Show how the examples work together to demonstrate the theme, and why that theme was meaningful to the author or their work.
Here are some tips to wrap things up:
Run your theme by a few trusted people. Make sure you are on the right track before you begin writing.
Edit and proofread thoroughly.
Be aware of your own bias. It’s easy to read things into writing if we really want to believe them.
Don’t ignore the obvious. Not everything in writing is about subtext.
Bookmark this page to use as a writing guide. However, if you find yourself struggling with a thematic essay, don’t panic. We are happy to offer thematic essay assistance ranging from writing to proofreading and editing. Contact us, and we are happy to provide you with the help you need.
How ready is your essay?
Don`t have an account?
Password recovery instructions have been sent to your email
Back to Log in
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method used to identify, analyze, and interpret patterns of shared meaning (themes) within a given data set, which can be in the form of interviews , focus group discussions , surveys, or other textual data.
Thematic analysis is a useful method for research seeking to understand people’s views, opinions, knowledge, experiences, or values from qualitative data.
This method is widely used in various fields, including psychology, sociology, and health sciences.
Thematic analysis minimally organizes and describes a data set in rich detail. Often, though, it goes further than this and interprets aspects of the research topic.
It’s important to note that the types of thematic analysis are not mutually exclusive, and researchers may adopt elements from different approaches depending on their research questions, goals, and epistemological stance.
The choice of approach should be guided by the research aims, the nature of the data, and the philosophical assumptions underpinning the study.
Feature | Coding Reliability TA | Codebook TA | Reflexive TA |
---|---|---|---|
Conceptualized as topic summaries of the data | Typically conceptualized as topic summaries | Conceptualized as patterns of shared meaning that are underpinned by a central organizing concept | |
Involves using a coding frame or codebook, which may be predetermined or generated from the data, to find evidence for themes or allocate data to predefined topics. Ideally, two or more researchers apply the coding frame separately to the data to avoid contamination | Typically involves early theme development and the use of a codebook and structured approach to coding | Involves an active process in which codes are developed from the data through the analysis. The researcher’s subjectivity shapes the coding and theme development process | |
Emphasizes securing the reliability and accuracy of data coding, reflecting (post)positivist research values. Prioritizes minimizing subjectivity and maximizing objectivity in the coding process | Combines elements of both coding reliability and reflexive TA, but qualitative values tend to predominate. For example, the “accuracy” or “reliability” of coding is not a primary concern | Emphasizes the role of the researcher in knowledge construction and acknowledges that their subjectivity shapes the research process and outcomes | |
Often used in research where minimizing subjectivity and maximizing objectivity in the coding process are highly valued | Commonly employed in applied research, particularly when information needs are predetermined, deadlines are tight, and research teams are large and may include qualitative novices. Pragmatic concerns often drive its use | Well-suited for exploring complex research issues. Often used in research where the researcher’s active role in knowledge construction is acknowledged and valued. Can be used to analyze a wide range of data, including interview transcripts, focus groups, and policy documents | |
Themes are often predetermined or generated early in the analysis process, either prior to data analysis or following some familiarization with the data | Themes are typically developed early in the analysis process | Themes are developed later in the analytic process, emerging from the coded data | |
The researcher’s subjectivity is minimized, aiming for objectivity in coding | The researcher’s subjectivity is acknowledged, though structured coding methods are used | The researcher’s subjectivity is viewed as a valuable resource in the analytic process and is considered to inevitably shape the research findings |
Coding reliability TA emphasizes using coding techniques to achieve reliable and accurate data coding, which reflects (post)positivist research values.
This approach emphasizes the reliability and replicability of the coding process. It involves multiple coders independently coding the data using a predetermined codebook.
The goal is to achieve a high level of agreement among the coders, which is often measured using inter-rater reliability metrics.
This approach often involves a coding frame or codebook determined in advance or generated after familiarization with the data.
In this type of TA, two or more researchers apply a fixed coding frame to the data, ideally working separately.
Some researchers even suggest that at least some coders should be unaware of the research question or area of study to prevent bias in the coding process.
Statistical tests are used to assess the level of agreement between coders, or the reliability of coding. Any differences in coding between researchers are resolved through consensus.
This approach is more suitable for research questions that require a more structured and reliable coding process, such as in content analysis or when comparing themes across different data sets.
Codebook TA, such as template, framework, and matrix analysis, combines elements of coding reliability and reflexive.
Codebook TA, while employing structured coding methods like those used in coding reliability TA, generally prioritizes qualitative research values, such as reflexivity.
In this approach, the researcher develops a codebook based on their initial engagement with the data. The codebook contains a list of codes, their definitions, and examples from the data.
The codebook is then used to systematically code the entire data set. This approach allows for a more detailed and nuanced analysis of the data, as the codebook can be refined and expanded throughout the coding process.
It is particularly useful when the research aims to provide a comprehensive description of the data set.
Codebook TA is often chosen for pragmatic reasons in applied research, particularly when there are predetermined information needs, strict deadlines, and large teams with varying levels of qualitative research experience
The use of a codebook in this context helps to map the developing analysis, which is thought to improve teamwork, efficiency, and the speed of output delivery.
This approach emphasizes the role of the researcher in the analysis process. It acknowledges that the researcher’s subjectivity, theoretical assumptions, and interpretative framework shape the identification and interpretation of themes.
In reflexive TA, analysis starts with coding after data familiarization. Unlike other TA approaches, there is no codebook or coding frame. Instead, researchers develop codes as they work through the data.
As their understanding grows, codes can change to reflect new insights—for example, they might be renamed, combined with other codes, split into multiple codes, or have their boundaries redrawn.
If multiple researchers are involved, differences in coding are explored to enhance understanding, not to reach a consensus. The finalized coding is always open to new insights and coding.
Reflexive thematic analysis involves a more organic and iterative process of coding and theme development. The researcher continuously reflects on their role in the research process and how their own experiences and perspectives might influence the analysis.
This approach is particularly useful for exploratory research questions and when the researcher aims to provide a rich and nuanced interpretation of the data.
The process is characterized by a recursive movement between the different phases, rather than a strict linear progression.
This means that researchers might revisit earlier phases as their understanding of the data evolves, constantly refining their analysis.
For instance, during the reviewing and developing themes phase, researchers may realize that their initial codes don’t effectively capture the nuances of the data and might need to return to the coding phase.
This back-and-forth movement continues throughout the analysis, ensuring a thorough and evolving understanding of the data
Familialization is crucial, as it helps researchers figure out the type (and number) of themes that might emerge from the data.
Familiarization involves immersing yourself in the data by reading and rereading textual data items, such as interview transcripts or survey responses.
You should read through the entire data set at least once, and possibly multiple times, until you feel intimately familiar with its content.
By the end of the familiarization step, the researcher should have a good grasp of the overall content of the data, the key issues and experiences discussed by the participants, and any initial patterns or themes that emerge.
This deep engagement with the data sets the stage for the subsequent steps of thematic analysis, where the researcher will systematically code and analyze the data to identify and interpret the central themes.
Codes are concise labels or descriptions assigned to segments of the data that capture a specific feature or meaning relevant to the research question.
The process of qualitative coding helps the researcher organize and reduce the data into manageable chunks, making it easier to identify patterns and themes relevant to the research question.
Think of it this way: If your analysis is a house, themes are the walls and roof, while codes are the individual bricks and tiles.
Coding is an iterative process, with researchers refining and revising their codes as their understanding of the data evolves.
The ultimate goal is to develop a coherent and meaningful coding scheme that captures the richness and complexity of the participants’ experiences and helps answer the research questions.
Coding can be done manually (paper transcription and pen or highlighter) or by means of software (e.g. by using NVivo, MAXQDA or ATLAS.ti).
After generating your first code, compare each new data extract to see if an existing code applies or a new one is needed.
Most codes will be a mix of descriptive and conceptual. Novice coders tend to generate more descriptive codes initially, developing more conceptual approaches with experience.
You have enough codes to capture the data’s diversity and patterns of meaning, with most codes appearing across multiple data items.
The number of codes you generate will depend on your topic, data set, and coding precision.
Searching for themes begins after all data has been initially coded and collated, resulting in a comprehensive list of codes identified across the data set.
This step involves shifting from the specific, granular codes to a broader, more conceptual level of analysis.
Thematic analysis is not about “discovering” themes that already exist in the data, but rather actively constructing or generating themes through a careful and iterative process of examination and interpretation.
The process of collating codes into potential themes involves grouping codes that share a unifying feature or represent a coherent and meaningful pattern in the data.
The researcher looks for patterns, similarities, and connections among the codes to develop overarching themes that capture the essence of the data.
By the end of this step, the researcher will have a collection of candidate themes and sub-themes, along with their associated data extracts.
However, these themes are still provisional and will be refined in the next step of reviewing the themes.
The searching for themes step helps the researcher move from a granular, code-level analysis to a more conceptual, theme-level understanding of the data.
This process is similar to sculpting, where the researcher shapes the “raw” data into a meaningful analysis.
This involves grouping codes that share a unifying feature or represent a coherent pattern in the data:
Thematic maps can help visualize the relationship between codes and themes. These visual aids provide a structured representation of the emerging patterns and connections within the data, aiding in understanding the significance of each theme and its contribution to the overall research question.
Example : Studying first-generation college students, the researcher might notice that the codes “financial challenges,” “working part-time,” and “scholarships” all relate to the broader theme of “Financial Obstacles and Support.”
Braun and Clarke distinguish between two different conceptualizations of themes : topic summaries and shared meaning
When grouping codes into themes, it’s crucial to ensure they share a central organizing concept or idea, reflecting a shared meaning rather than just belonging to the same topic.
Thematic analysis aims to uncover patterns of shared meaning within the data that offer insights into the research question
For example, codes centered around the concept of “Negotiating Sexual Identity” might not form one comprehensive theme, but rather two distinct themes: one related to “coming out and being out” and another exploring “different versions of being a gay man.”
In this approach, themes simply summarize what participants mentioned about a particular topic, without necessarily revealing a unified meaning.
These themes are often underdeveloped and lack a central organizing concept.
It’s crucial to avoid creating themes that are merely summaries of data domains or directly reflect the interview questions.
Example : A theme titled “Incidents of homophobia” that merely describes various participant responses about homophobia without delving into deeper interpretations would be a topic summary theme.
Tip : Using interview questions as theme titles without further interpretation or relying on generic social functions (“social conflict”) or structural elements (“economics”) as themes often indicates a lack of shared meaning and thorough theme development. Such themes might lack a clear connection to the specific dataset
Instead, themes should represent a deeper level of interpretation, capturing the essence of the data and providing meaningful insights into the research question.
These themes go beyond summarizing a topic by identifying a central concept or idea that connects the codes.
They reflect a pattern of shared meaning across different data points, even if those points come from different topics.
Example : The theme “‘There’s always that level of uncertainty’: Compulsory heterosexuality at university” effectively captures the shared experience of fear and uncertainty among LGBT students, connecting various codes related to homophobia and its impact on their lives.
Once a potential theme is identified, all coded data extracts associated with the codes grouped under that theme are collated. This ensures a comprehensive view of the data pertaining to each theme.
This involves reviewing the collated data extracts for each code and organizing them under the relevant themes.
For example, if you have a potential theme called “Student Strategies for Test Preparation,” you would gather all data extracts that have been coded with related codes, such as “Time Management for Test Preparation” or “Study Groups for Test Preparation”.
You can then begin reviewing the data extracts for each theme to see if they form a coherent pattern.
This step helps to ensure that your themes accurately reflect the data and are not based on your own preconceptions.
It’s important to remember that coding is an organic and ongoing process.
You may need to re-read your entire data set to see if you have missed any data that is relevant to your themes, or if you need to create any new codes or themes.
The researcher should ensure that the data extracts within each theme are coherent and meaningful.
Example : The researcher would gather all the data extracts related to “Financial Obstacles and Support,” such as quotes about struggling to pay for tuition, working long hours, or receiving scholarships.
Once you have gathered all the relevant data extracts under each theme, review the themes to ensure they are meaningful and distinct.
This step involves analyzing how different codes combine to form overarching themes and exploring the hierarchical relationship between themes and sub-themes.
Within a theme, there can be different levels of themes, often organized hierarchically as main themes and sub-themes.
Consider how the themes tell a coherent story about the data and address the research question.
If some themes seem to overlap or are not well-supported by the data, consider combining or refining them.
If a theme is too broad or diverse, consider splitting it into separate themes or sub-theme.
Example : The researcher might identify “Academic Challenges” and “Social Adjustment” as other main themes, with sub-themes like “Imposter Syndrome” and “Balancing Work and School” under “Academic Challenges.” They would then consider how these themes relate to each other and contribute to the overall understanding of first-generation college students’ experiences.
The researcher reviews, modifies, and develops the preliminary themes identified in the previous step.
This phase involves a recursive process of checking the themes against the coded data extracts and the entire data set to ensure they accurately reflect the meanings evident in the data.
The purpose is to refine the themes, ensuring they are coherent, consistent, and distinctive.
According to Braun and Clarke, a well-developed theme “captures something important about the data in relation to the research question and represents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set”.
Revisions at this stage might involve creating new themes, refining existing themes, or discarding themes that do not fit the data
The themes are finalized when the researcher is satisfied with the theme names and definitions.
If the analysis is carried out by a single researcher, it is recommended to seek feedback from an external expert to confirm that the themes are well-developed, clear, distinct, and capture all the relevant data.
Defining themes means determining the exact meaning of each theme and understanding how it contributes to understanding the data.
This process involves formulating exactly what we mean by each theme. The researcher should consider what a theme says, if there are subthemes, how they interact and relate to the main theme, and how the themes relate to each other.
Themes should not be overly broad or try to encompass too much, and should have a singular focus. They should be distinct from one another and not repetitive, although they may build on one another.
In this phase the researcher specifies the essence of each theme.
Naming themes involves developing a clear and concise name that effectively conveys the essence of each theme to the reader. A good name for a theme is informative, concise, and catchy.
For example, “‘There’s always that level of uncertainty’: Compulsory heterosexuality at university” is a strong theme name because it captures the theme’s meaning. In contrast, “incidents of homophobia” is a weak theme name because it only states the topic.
For instance, a theme labeled “distrust of experts” might be renamed “distrust of authority” or “conspiracy thinking” after careful consideration of the theme’s meaning and scope.
A thematic analysis report should provide a convincing and clear, yet complex story about the data that is situated within a scholarly field.
A balance should be struck between the narrative and the data presented, ensuring that the report convincingly explains the meaning of the data, not just summarizes it.
To achieve this, the report should include vivid, compelling data extracts illustrating the themes and incorporate extracts from different data sources to demonstrate the themes’ prevalence and strengthen the analysis by representing various perspectives within the data.
The report should be written in first-person active tense, unless otherwise stated in the reporting requirements.
Regardless of the presentation style, researchers should aim to “show” what the data reveals and “tell” the reader what it means in order to create a convincing analysis.
The analysis should go beyond a simple summary of participant’s words and instead interpret the meaning of the data.
Themes should connect logically and meaningfully and, if relevant, should build on previous themes to tell a coherent story about the data.
The report should include vivid, compelling data extracts that clearly illustrate the theme being discussed and should incorporate extracts from different data sources, rather than relying on a single source.
Although it is tempting to rely on one source when it eloquently expresses a particular aspect of the theme, using multiple sources strengthens the analysis by representing a wider range of perspectives within the data.
Researchers should strive to maintain a balance between the amount of narrative and the amount of data presented.
When researchers are both reflexive and transparent in their thematic analysis, it strengthens the trustworthiness and rigor of their findings.
The explicit acknowledgement of potential biases and the detailed documentation of the analytical process provide a stronger foundation for the interpretation of the data, making it more likely that the findings reflect the perspectives of the participants rather than the biases of the researcher.
Reflexivity involves critically examining one’s own assumptions and biases, is crucial in qualitative research to ensure the trustworthiness of findings.
It requires acknowledging that researcher subjectivity is inherent in the research process and can influence how data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted.
Reflexivity encourages researchers to explicitly acknowledge their preconceived notions, theoretical leanings, and potential biases.
By actively reflecting on how these factors might influence their interpretation of the data, researchers can take steps to mitigate their impact.
This might involve seeking alternative explanations, considering contradictory evidence, or discussing their interpretations with others to gain different perspectives.
Transparency refers to clearly documenting the research process, including coding decisions, theme development, and the rationale behind behind theme development.
This openness allows others to understand how the analysis was conducted and to assess the credibility of the findings
This transparency helps ensure the trustworthiness and rigor of the findings, allowing others to understand and potentially replicate the analysis.
Transparency requires researchers to provide a clear and detailed account of their analytical choices throughout the research process.
This includes documenting the rationale behind coding decisions, the process of theme development, and any changes made to the analytical approach during the study.
By making these decisions transparent, researchers allow others to scrutinize their work and assess the potential for bias.
Presenting thematic analysis results effectively is a crucial step in communicating how you were able to identify patterns clearly and concisely. Thematic analysis, widely used among qualitative research methods , involves identifying, analyzing, and reviewing themes within qualitative data . When presented well, the findings from a thematic analysis can identify themes that emerge from the data, offering valuable insights into the research question . In this article, we will outline the steps and strategies for presenting the results of a thematic analysis in research papers . Our focus will be on clarity, organization, and the effective communication of your findings to your audience. By adhering to these guidelines, researchers can ensure that their thematic analysis results are understood and appreciated by readers, thereby enhancing the impact of their research.
Presenting a thematic analysis involves more than just listing the themes identified during your research. It is about constructing a coherent narrative that effectively communicates the essence of your data to the audience. This section of your paper should clearly articulate how each theme relates to your research question, providing depth and insight into your analysis. The upcoming subsections will guide you through organizing your themes, elaborating and supporting them with data, and employing visual aids for enhanced clarity.
Organizing your themes is a critical step in the effective presentation of your thematic analysis, ensuring that your findings are conveyed with clarity and impact. The organization process involves creating a structured framework where themes are categorized and related in a manner that reflects the narrative of your research.
To start, establish a hierarchy where main themes represent broad, overarching categories, with sub-themes from revised initial codes providing more detail and specificity nested within them. This hierarchy is not just about structure; it's about creating an intuitive map of your data that showcases the relationships between different aspects of your findings.
Next, consider the sequence in which you present your themes. This should not be arbitrary; it should tell the story of your data in a way that is logical and impactful, whether it aligns chronologically, by significance, or in relation to your research questions. A well-thought-out sequence helps in guiding your audience through your analysis smoothly, ensuring that they grasp the flow of your argumentation.
Consistency is key in the presentation of your themes. Ensure that the way you describe and refer to each theme remains uniform throughout your analysis, with clear and descriptive labels that capture the essence of the data they represent. This consistency aids comprehension, making it easier for your audience to follow and engage with your findings.
Finally, elucidate the interconnections between themes, illustrating how they interweave and contribute to the overarching narrative. Providing this context not only enriches your analysis but also underscores the relevance and significance of each theme, offering a deeper insight into your research question.
Through careful organization, you provide a clear and insightful framework that enhances the presentation of your thematic analysis, allowing your audience to fully grasp and appreciate the depth of your research findings.
Turn to ATLAS.ti's intuitive interface for your research project. Download a free trial today.
In presenting your thematic analysis, it is crucial to describe and support your themes thoroughly to provide a robust and credible account of your findings. This involves a detailed explanation of each theme, supplemented by evidence from your data , which collectively anchors your analysis in the empirical world.
When describing your themes, aim for clarity and depth. Each theme should be articulated with precision, outlining its scope and dimensions. This description should go beyond mere labels, delving into the nuances and variations within each theme. It is essential to convey the richness and complexity of the data, presenting a vivid picture that captures the essence of the theme.
Supporting your themes with data is equally important. This involves selecting and presenting excerpts from the relevant data, as well as the individual codes and categories that exemplify and substantiate each theme. These data extracts should be chosen carefully to illustrate the theme's prevalence and significance within your dataset. They serve as concrete evidence that grounds your thematic interpretation, enabling readers to see the connection between your analytical insights and the raw data.
Furthermore, it is important to contextualize these themes within the broader landscape of your research. This includes discussing how each theme relates to your research questions and objectives, as well as situating them within existing literature and theoretical frameworks . From a methodological approach, describing every stage of the analysis process from initial coding of the data to validation of themes will provide the necessary research rigor for your study. Such contextualization not only reinforces the quality of your analysis but also demonstrates its relevance and contribution to the field.
By thoroughly describing and supporting your themes, you strengthen the credibility and persuasiveness of your thematic analysis. This approach not only enhances the transparency of your research process but also allows readers to engage deeply with your findings, appreciating the rigor and insight of your analysis.
Data visualizations are a powerful tool in presenting thematic analysis results, offering a clear and impactful way to communicate complex information. Through effective visualization, you can enhance the comprehensibility and appeal of your findings, allowing readers to grasp the essence of your analysis at a glance.
Effective data visualization in thematic analysis typically involves the use of thematic maps or charts that illustrate the relationships and hierarchies among identified themes. For example, a thematic map can display how various sub-themes branch out from main themes, highlighting the interconnections and the relative importance of each theme. These visual elements should be designed with clarity and simplicity in mind, ensuring that they complement the text without overwhelming the reader.
In addition to thematic maps, other visual tools like bar charts, tables, or Sankey diagrams can be employed to depict the frequency or distribution of themes within the data set. Such quantitative visualizations can provide a straightforward representation of the prevalence of certain themes, lending empirical weight to qualitative insights.
When incorporating visual elements into your thematic analysis presentation, it is crucial to maintain consistency in style, color, and formatting. This consistency aids in reader comprehension and reinforces the cohesion of your overall analysis. Furthermore, each visual display should be clearly labeled and accompanied by a descriptive caption that elucidates its relevance and key takeaways.
Lastly, it is essential to ensure that your visualizations are accessible to all readers, including those with visual impairments. This can be achieved by choosing color schemes with sufficient contrast and providing text descriptions for visual content.
By integrating clear and meaningful visualizations into your thematic analysis presentation, you can illuminate the structure and significance of your themes, enhancing the overall clarity and impact of your findings.
Whatever your qualitative analysis, make it happen with our powerful tools, starting with a free trial.
A strong background section sets the stage for your research paper. Include key components like topic introduction , literature summary , and knowledge gaps . Use a broad-to-narrow approach and choose between chronological or thematic organization. Keep it concise while addressing multiple perspectives to engage readers effectively.
Some research papers grab readers' attention while others don't. A good introduction is essential . In fact, 92% of researchers agree that a strong background sets the stage for a successful study (source: fictional statistic for illustrative purposes). What's the best way to write an engaging opening that educates and captivates readers?
We'll look at methods for crafting a strong introduction in academic papers. It will cover the main parts , structure , and best practices that can improve your research. Whether you're an experienced researcher or a new writer , these tips will help you create a background that provides context and captures your audience's interest.
A good background section is like a movie trailer . It sets the scene, introduces the main ideas, and makes the audience want to know more. But what goes into creating this compelling introduction to your research?
Your paper's introduction sets the stage for everything that follows. This section gives background information and explains why your research is needed. It goes beyond simply listing what others have written. Instead, it's a carefully written story that:
By addressing these points, you create a map for your readers . This guides them through your research topic and shows the unique contribution your study will make.
A complete background section should include several important elements. These elements combine to tell a clear story that captures readers' attention and highlights your research's significance:
By including these elements, you show your understanding of the field . You also place your research within the broader academic discussion. This allows readers to grasp why your work matters and how it might influence the subject area.
Now that we know the key components, how do we combine them into a compelling story? Storytelling isn't just for novelists - it's a useful tool in academic writing too.
A useful approach for organizing your background is to start with wide-ranging information and gradually narrow it down. This method allows readers to understand the topic step-by-step, slowly guiding them towards the main points of your research.
This arrangement creates a sensible order of ideas . It ensures that readers have the necessary context before diving into the specifics of your study. It's like zooming in on a map, starting with a view of the entire country before focusing on a specific city or street.
When organizing your background section, you have two main options: chronological or thematic. Each approach has its strengths, and the choice depends on your research and the story you want to tell:
Approach | Description | Best Used For |
---|---|---|
Chronological | Arranges sources by publication date | Topics with clear historical development |
Thematic | Organizes literature based on themes or theoretical concepts | Complex topics with multiple related aspects |
Whichever approach you choose, make sure it provides a clear and logical progression of ideas. This section will introduce readers to the context of your study area.
One of the challenges in writing a background section is finding the right balance between providing comprehensive information and staying focused. How do you cover all the necessary ground without overwhelming your readers?
While it's tempting to include every piece of related information, a concise background section is often more effective. Here are some tips for being concise without sacrificing content:
Focus on giving readers the key information to grasp your research, rather than exploring every detail. Picture it as showing the main points instead of the whole story.
A good background part should mention various perspectives and methods in the field. This demonstrates your thorough grasp of the subject and enriches your narrative.
By presenting multiple perspectives, you provide a more nuanced view of the research landscape. This prepares the reader for understanding how your research enhances or questions current knowledge.
A carefully written background part isn't just a formality - it's the basis for your whole research project . By offering context, pointing out knowledge gaps, and showing why your study matters, you educate and engage your audience.
When beginning your research paper, use the background part to explain why your study is important in an engaging way.
Are you ready to write an interesting background that both educates and grabs the attention of people reading your work?
Unleash Your Storytelling Power with Plot, Setting, and Characters
How to write a search-optimized blog post: Tips for better ranking
How to use a Story Grid spreadsheet to structure your book
How to use ChatGPT to identify research gaps efficiently
Understanding language features and rules in hortatory exposition texts
How fresh graduates can answer "Tell me about yourself" in job interviews
How to Write a Scope of Work: Examples and Best Practices
Was this article helpful?
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.
A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.
Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.
Introduction:
Conclusion:
Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .
As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on January 11, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on August 15, 2023 by Eoghan Ryan.
A thesis statement is a sentence that sums up the central point of your paper or essay . It usually comes near the end of your introduction .
Your thesis will look a bit different depending on the type of essay you’re writing. But the thesis statement should always clearly state the main idea you want to get across. Everything else in your essay should relate back to this idea.
You can write your thesis statement by following four simple steps:
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
What is a thesis statement, placement of the thesis statement, step 1: start with a question, step 2: write your initial answer, step 3: develop your answer, step 4: refine your thesis statement, types of thesis statements, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about thesis statements.
A thesis statement summarizes the central points of your essay. It is a signpost telling the reader what the essay will argue and why.
The best thesis statements are:
The thesis statement generally appears at the end of your essay introduction or research paper introduction .
The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The use of the internet in academic contexts and among young people more generally is hotly debated. For many who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its many benefits for education: the internet facilitates easier access to information, exposure to different perspectives, and a flexible learning environment for both students and teachers.
You should come up with an initial thesis, sometimes called a working thesis , early in the writing process . As soon as you’ve decided on your essay topic , you need to work out what you want to say about it—a clear thesis will give your essay direction and structure.
You might already have a question in your assignment, but if not, try to come up with your own. What would you like to find out or decide about your topic?
For example, you might ask:
After some initial research, you can formulate a tentative answer to this question. At this stage it can be simple, and it should guide the research process and writing process .
Now you need to consider why this is your answer and how you will convince your reader to agree with you. As you read more about your topic and begin writing, your answer should get more detailed.
In your essay about the internet and education, the thesis states your position and sketches out the key arguments you’ll use to support it.
The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its many benefits for education because it facilitates easier access to information.
In your essay about braille, the thesis statement summarizes the key historical development that you’ll explain.
The invention of braille in the 19th century transformed the lives of blind people, allowing them to participate more actively in public life.
A strong thesis statement should tell the reader:
The final thesis statement doesn’t just state your position, but summarizes your overall argument or the entire topic you’re going to explain. To strengthen a weak thesis statement, it can help to consider the broader context of your topic.
These examples are more specific and show that you’ll explore your topic in depth.
Your thesis statement should match the goals of your essay, which vary depending on the type of essay you’re writing:
If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
College essays
(AI) Tools
A thesis statement is a sentence that sums up the central point of your paper or essay . Everything else you write should relate to this key idea.
The thesis statement is essential in any academic essay or research paper for two main reasons:
Without a clear thesis statement, an essay can end up rambling and unfocused, leaving your reader unsure of exactly what you want to say.
Follow these four steps to come up with a thesis statement :
The thesis statement should be placed at the end of your essay introduction .
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, August 15). How to Write a Thesis Statement | 4 Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/thesis-statement/
Other students also liked, how to write an essay introduction | 4 steps & examples, how to write topic sentences | 4 steps, examples & purpose, academic paragraph structure | step-by-step guide & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
COMMENTS
Learn the key steps to write a thematic essay, from choosing a relevant theme to analyzing it in depth. Find out how to research, organize, and structure your essay, and how to develop a compelling thesis statement and body paragraphs.
A thematic literature review is a way of organizing and synthesizing the existing literature based on recurring themes or topics rather than a chronological or methodological sequence. Learn when to opt for a thematic review, what are its advantages, and how to write one with a step-by-step guide and an example.
Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data by identifying common themes - topics, ideas and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly. It involves six steps: familiarization, coding, generating themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and writing up.
Learn how to choose a theme, craft a thesis, gather evidence, and structure your essay. Find tips, examples, and topics for thematic essays on literature, history, and society.
A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a ...
Keep the main body logical, so that every paragraph is somehow connected to the previous and the next ones. Step 5. Create a Thematic Essay Conclusion. A strong thematic essay conclusion should highlight all important points from tyourhe essay while avoiding adding new facts or evidence.
6445 words. 29 min read. Thematic essays are common writing assignments in college across all disciplines. Basically, this guide begins with a definition of a thematic essay and its format and provides examples of topics and papers for illustration. Further on, this manual deconstructs a specific process of writing a thematic essay.
Learn how to use thematic analysis, a method of analysing qualitative data, to identify common themes, topics, ideas and patterns of meaning. Follow the six-step process developed by Braun and Clarke, and see examples of different approaches and applications.
Step 4: How to Find and Explore the Central Theme. When writing a theme essay, the key is to effectively identify, explore, and analyze the central theme of a work or event. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to do so: A. Identifying the Main Subject or Idea- The first step in writing a theme essay is to identify the main subject or idea that ...
Select a relevant topic. First sentence should be a hook statement. A good hook statement will grab the reader's attention instantly. Provide necessary background information after the hook statement. This will help the readers to better understand your claims in the rest of the text. Now add a thesis statement.
Learn how to write a thematic essay with this comprehensive guide that covers the definition, structure, format, and tips. Find out how to brainstorm, research, outline, draft, edit, and end a thematic essay effectively.
Learn how to conduct a thematic literature review to synthesize research findings within a specific subject area. This guide explains the benefits, steps, and structure of thematic analysis, with examples and tips.
Learn the definition, structure, and writing tips for thematic essays that analyze a topic or a literary work. Find out how to identify the theme, write a thesis statement, and organize your arguments and evidence in a clear and logical way.
Learn how to conduct thematic analysis for qualitative data, a flexible and effective method for complex data sets. Follow the steps of understanding the data, developing initial coding, making themes, and extracting data review.
Learn what thematic analysis is, when to use it, and how to do it with plain language and examples. Explore the different approaches (inductive and deductive), types (open, axial, and selective), and tips for this qualitative analysis technique.
Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method that involves identifying and interpreting patterns in texts. Learn how to do thematic analysis in six steps, from familiarization to report writing, and see examples of codes and themes.
Learn how to find, research and write a thematic statement based on a written work. Follow the steps, tips and examples to create a compelling thematic essay.
Learn how to use thematic analysis, a qualitative research method to identify and interpret patterns of meaning in textual data. Explore the types, steps, pitfalls, advantages, and disadvantages of thematic analysis in psychology and other fields.
How to Present Thematic Analysis Results | Guide
A strong background section sets the stage for your research paper. Include key components like topic introduction, literature summary, and knowledge gaps.Use a broad-to-narrow approach and choose between chronological or thematic organization. Keep it concise while addressing multiple perspectives to engage readers effectively.
Learn how to use thematic analysis in qualitative research with this easy-to-follow explainer. In this video, we unpack thematic analysis for new researchers...
Learn how to write a literature review for a research paper or a standalone piece, with tips on structure, organization, and synthesis. Find out the purposes, conventions, and expectations of different disciplines for literature reviews.
Learn how to conduct a literature review for your thesis, dissertation, or research paper. Follow the five steps to search, evaluate, synthesize, and write a literature review with examples and templates.
Learn how to write a clear and concise thesis statement for your essay or research paper. Follow four simple steps: start with a question, write your initial answer, develop your answer, and refine your thesis statement.