thesis proposal statistics

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation

How to Write a Dissertation or Thesis Proposal

Published on September 21, 2022 by Tegan George . Revised on July 18, 2023.

When starting your thesis or dissertation process, one of the first requirements is a research proposal or a prospectus. It describes what or who you want to examine, delving into why, when, where, and how you will do so, stemming from your research question and a relevant topic .

The proposal or prospectus stage is crucial for the development of your research. It helps you choose a type of research to pursue, as well as whether to pursue qualitative or quantitative methods and what your research design will look like.

You can download our templates in the format of your choice below.

Download Word template Download Google Docs template

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What should your proposal contain, dissertation question examples, what should your proposal look like, dissertation prospectus examples, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about proposals.

Prior to jumping into the research for your thesis or dissertation, you first need to develop your research proposal and have it approved by your supervisor. It should outline all of the decisions you have taken about your project, from your dissertation topic to your hypotheses and research objectives .

Depending on your department’s requirements, there may be a defense component involved, where you present your research plan in prospectus format to your committee for their approval.

Your proposal should answer the following questions:

• Why is your research necessary?
• What is already known about your topic?
• Where and when will your research be conducted?
• Who should be studied?
• How can the research best be done?

Ultimately, your proposal should persuade your supervisor or committee that your proposed project is worth pursuing.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Strong research kicks off with a solid research question , and dissertations are no exception to this.

Dissertation research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly
• What are the main factors enticing people under 30 in suburban areas to engage in the gig economy?
• Which techniques prove most effective for 1st-grade teachers at local elementary schools in engaging students with special needs?
• Which communication streams are the most effective for getting those aged 18-30 to the polls on Election Day?

An easy rule of thumb is that your proposal will usually resemble a (much) shorter version of your thesis or dissertation. While of course it won’t include the results section , discussion section , or conclusion , it serves as a “mini” version or roadmap for what you eventually seek to write.

Be sure to include:

• A succinct introduction to your topic and problem statement
• A brief literature review situating your topic within existing research
• A basic outline of the research methods you think will best answer your research question
• The perceived implications for future research
• A reference list in the citation style of your choice

The length of your proposal varies quite a bit depending on your discipline and type of work you’re conducting. While a thesis proposal is often only 3-7 pages long, a prospectus for your dissertation is usually much longer, with more detailed analysis. Dissertation proposals can be up to 25-30 pages in length.

Writing a proposal or prospectus can be a challenge, but we’ve compiled some examples for you to get your started.

• Example #1: “Geographic Representations of the Planet Mars, 1867-1907” by Maria Lane
• Example #2: “Individuals and the State in Late Bronze Age Greece: Messenian Perspectives on Mycenaean Society” by Dimitri Nakassis
• Example #3: “Manhood Up in the Air: A Study of Male Flight Attendants, Queerness, and Corporate Capitalism during the Cold War Era” by Phil Tiemeyer

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

Research bias

• Survivorship bias
• Self-serving bias
• Availability heuristic
• Halo effect
• Hindsight bias
• Deep learning
• Generative AI
• Machine learning
• Reinforcement learning
• Supervised vs. unsupervised learning

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .

• If you want to measure something or test a hypothesis , use quantitative methods . If you want to explore ideas, thoughts and meanings, use qualitative methods .
• If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. If you want data specific to your purposes with control over how it is generated, collect primary data.
• If you want to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables , use experimental methods. If you want to understand the characteristics of a research subject, use descriptive methods.

A thesis or dissertation outline is one of the most critical first steps in your writing process. It helps you to lay out and organize your ideas and can provide you with a roadmap for deciding what kind of research you’d like to undertake.

Generally, an outline contains information on the different sections included in your thesis or dissertation , such as:

• Your anticipated title
• Your abstract
• Your chapters (sometimes subdivided into further topics like literature review , research methods , avenues for future research, etc.)

A well-planned research design helps ensure that your methods match your research aims, that you collect high-quality data, and that you use the right kind of analysis to answer your questions, utilizing credible sources . This allows you to draw valid , trustworthy conclusions.

The priorities of a research design can vary depending on the field, but you usually have to specify:

• Your research questions and/or hypotheses
• Your overall approach (e.g., qualitative or quantitative )
• The type of design you’re using (e.g., a survey , experiment , or case study )
• Your sampling methods or criteria for selecting subjects
• Your data collection methods (e.g., questionnaires , observations)
• Your data collection procedures (e.g., operationalization , timing and data management)
• Your data analysis methods (e.g., statistical tests  or thematic analysis )

A dissertation prospectus or proposal describes what or who you plan to research for your dissertation. It delves into why, when, where, and how you will do your research, as well as helps you choose a type of research to pursue. You should also determine whether you plan to pursue qualitative or quantitative methods and what your research design will look like.

It should outline all of the decisions you have taken about your project, from your dissertation topic to your hypotheses and research objectives , ready to be approved by your supervisor or committee.

Note that some departments require a defense component, where you present your prospectus to your committee orally.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. (2023, July 18). How to Write a Dissertation or Thesis Proposal. Scribbr. Retrieved July 30, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/thesis-dissertation-proposal/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, a step-by-step guide to the writing process, 10 research question examples to guide your research project, dissertation & thesis outline | example & free templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing with Descriptive Statistics

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

Usually there is no good way to write a statistic. It rarely sounds good, and often interrupts the structure or flow of your writing. Oftentimes the best way to write descriptive statistics is to be direct. If you are citing several statistics about the same topic, it may be best to include them all in the same paragraph or section.

The mean of exam two is 77.7. The median is 75, and the mode is 79. Exam two had a standard deviation of 11.6.

Overall the company had another excellent year. We shipped 14.3 tons of fertilizer for the year, and averaged 1.7 tons of fertilizer during the summer months. This is an increase over last year, where we shipped only 13.1 tons of fertilizer, and averaged only 1.4 tons during the summer months. (Standard deviations were as followed: this summer .3 tons, last summer .4 tons).

Some fields prefer to put means and standard deviations in parentheses like this:

If you have lots of statistics to report, you should strongly consider presenting them in tables or some other visual form. You would then highlight statistics of interest in your text, but would not report all of the statistics. See the section on statistics and visuals for more details.

If you have a data set that you are using (such as all the scores from an exam) it would be unusual to include all of the scores in a paper or article. One of the reasons to use statistics is to condense large amounts of information into more manageable chunks; presenting your entire data set defeats this purpose.

At the bare minimum, if you are presenting statistics on a data set, it should include the mean and probably the standard deviation. This is the minimum information needed to get an idea of what the distribution of your data set might look like. How much additional information you include is entirely up to you. In general, don't include information if it is irrelevant to your argument or purpose. If you include statistics that many of your readers would not understand, consider adding the statistics in a footnote or appendix that explains it in more detail.

Secondary Menu

• Master's Thesis

As an integral component of the Master of Science in Statistical Science program, you can submit and defend a Master's Thesis. Your Master's Committee administers this oral examination. If you choose to defend a thesis, it is advisable to commence your research early, ideally during your second semester or the summer following your first year in the program. It's essential to allocate sufficient time for the thesis writing process. Your thesis advisor, who also serves as the committee chair, must approve both your thesis title and proposal. The final thesis work necessitates approval from all committee members and must adhere to the  Master's thesis requirements  set forth by the Duke University Graduate School.

Master’s BEST Award 

Each second-year Duke Master’s of Statistical Science (MSS) student defending their MSS thesis may be eligible for the  Master’s BEST Award . The Statistical Science faculty BEST Award Committee selects the awardee based on the submitted thesis of MSS thesis students, and the award is presented at the departmental graduation ceremony. 

Thesis Proposal

All second-year students choosing to do a thesis must submit a proposal (not more than two pages) approved by their thesis advisor to the Master's Director via Qualtrics by November 10th.  The thesis proposal should include a title,  the thesis advisor, committee members, and a description of your work. The description must introduce the research topic, outline its main objectives, and emphasize the significance of the research and its implications while identifying gaps in existing statistical literature. In addition, it can include some of the preliminary results. 

Committee members

MSS Students will have a thesis committee, which includes three faculty members - two must be departmental primary faculty, and the third could be from an external department in an applied area of the student’s interest, which must be a  Term Graduate Faculty through the Graduate School or have a secondary appointment with the Department of Statistical Science. All Committee members must be familiar with the Student’s work.  The department coordinates Committee approval. The thesis defense committee must be approved at least 30 days before the defense date.

Thesis Timeline and  Departmental Process:

Before defense:.

Intent to Graduate: Students must file an Intent to Graduate in ACES, specifying "Thesis Defense" during the application. For graduation deadlines, please refer to https://gradschool.duke.edu/academics/preparing-graduate .

Scheduling Thesis Defense: The student collaborates with the committee to set the date and time for the defense and communicates this information to the department, along with the thesis title. The defense must be scheduled during regular class sessions. Be sure to review the thesis defense and submission deadlines at https://gradschool.duke.edu/academics/theses-and-dissertations/

Room Reservations: The department arranges room reservations and sends confirmation details to the student, who informs committee members of the location.

Defense Announcement: The department prepares a defense announcement, providing a copy to the student and chair. After approval, it is signed by the Master's Director and submitted to the Graduate School. Copies are also posted on department bulletin boards.

Initial Thesis Submission: Two weeks before the defense, the student submits the initial thesis to the committee and the Graduate School. Detailed thesis formatting guidelines can be found at https://gradschool.duke.edu/academics/theses-and-dissertations.

Advisor Notification: The student requests that the advisor email [email protected] , confirming the candidate's readiness for defense. This step should be completed before the exam card appointment.

Format Check Appointment: One week before the defense, the Graduate School contacts the student to schedule a format check appointment. Upon approval, the Graduate School provides the Student Master’s Exam Card, which enables the student to send a revised thesis copy to committee members.

MSS Annual Report Form: The department provides the student with the MSS Annual Report Form to be presented at the defense.

Post Defense:

Communication of Defense Outcome: The committee chair conveys the defense results to the student, including any necessary follow-up actions in case of an unsuccessful defense.

In Case of Failure: If a student does not pass the thesis defense, the committee's decision to fail the student must be accompanied by explicit and clear comments from the chair, specifying deficiencies and areas that require attention for improvement.

Documentation: The student should ensure that the committee signs the Title Page, Abstract Page, and Exam Card.

Annual Report Form: The committee chair completes the Annual Report Form.

Master's Director Approval: The Master's director must provide their approval by signing the Exam Card.

Form Submission: Lastly, the committee chair is responsible for returning all completed and signed forms to the Department.

Final Thesis Submission: The student must meet the Graduate School requirement by submitting the final version of their Thesis to the Graduate School via ProQuest before the specified deadline. For detailed information, visit https://gradschool.duke.edu/academics/preparinggraduate .

• The Stochastic Proximal Distance Algorithm
• Logistic-tree Normal Mixture for Clustering Microbiome Compositions
• Inference for Dynamic Treatment Regimes using Overlapping Sampling Splitting
• Bayesian Modeling for Identifying Selection in B Cell Maturation
• Differentially Private Verification with Survey Weights
• Stable Variable Selection for Sparse Linear Regression in a Non-uniqueness Regime  
• A Cost-Sensitive, Semi-Supervised, and Active Learning Approach for Priority Outlier Investigation
• Bayesian Decoupling: A Decision Theory-Based Approach to Bayesian Variable Selection
• A Differentially Private Bayesian Approach to Replication Analysis
• Numerical Approximation of Gaussian-Smoothed Optimal Transport
• Computational Challenges to Bayesian Density Discontinuity Regression
• Hierarchical Signal Propagation for Household Level Sales in Bayesian Dynamic Models
• Logistic Tree Gaussian Processes (LoTgGaP) for Microbiome Dynamics and Treatment Effects
• Bayesian Inference on Ratios Subject to Differentially Private Noise
• Multiple Imputation Inferences for Count Data
• An Euler Characteristic Curve Based Representation of 3D Shapes in Statistical Analysis
• An Investigation Into the Bias & Variance of Almost Matching Exactly Methods
• Comparison of Bayesian Inference Methods for Probit Network Models
• Differentially Private Counts with Additive Constraints
• Multi-Scale Graph Principal Component Analysis for Connectomics
• MCMC Sampling Geospatial Partitions for Linear Models
• Bayesian Dynamic Network Modeling with Censored Flow Data  
• An Application of Graph Diffusion for Gesture Classification
• Easy and Efficient Bayesian Infinite Factor Analysis
• Analyzing Amazon CD Reviews with Bayesian Monitoring and Machine Learning Methods
• Missing Data Imputation for Voter Turnout Using Auxiliary Margins
• Generalized and Scalable Optimal Sparse Decision Trees
• Construction of Objective Bayesian Prior from Bertrand’s Paradox and the Principle of Indifference
• Rethinking Non-Linear Instrumental Variables
• Clustering-Enhanced Stochastic Gradient MCMC for Hidden Markov Models
• Optimal Sparse Decision Trees
• Bayesian Density Regression with a Jump Discontinuity at a Given Threshold
• Forecasting the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A Bayesian Dynamic Graphical Modeling Approach
• Testing Between Different Types of Poisson Mixtures with Applications to Neuroscience
• Multiple Imputation of Missing Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials
• A Bayesian Strategy to the 20 Question Game with Applications to Recommender Systems
• Applied Factor Dynamic Analysis for Macroeconomic Forecasting
• A Theory of Statistical Inference for Ensuring the Robustness of Scientific Results
• Bayesian Inference Via Partitioning Under Differential Privacy
• A Bayesian Forward Simulation Approach to Establishing a Realistic Prior Model for Complex Geometrical Objects
• Two Applications of Summary Statistics: Integrating Information Across Genes and Confidence Intervals with Missing Data
• Our Mission
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
• International Recognition
• Department History
• Past Recipients
• Considering a Statistical Science major at Duke?
• Careers for Statisticians
• Typical Pathways
• Applied Electives for BS
• Interdepartmental Majors
• Minor in Statistical Science
• Getting Started with Statistics
• Student Learning Outcomes
• Study Abroad
• Course Help & Tutoring
• Past Theses
• Research Teams
• Independent Study
• Transfer Credit
• Conference Funding for Research
• Statistical Science Majors Union
• Duke Actuarial Society
• Duke Sports Analytics Club
• Trinity Ambassadors
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Summer Session Courses
• How to Apply
• Financial Support
• Graduate Placements
• Living in Durham
• Preliminary Examination
• Dissertation
• English Language Requirement
• TA Guidelines
• Progress Toward Completion
• Ph.D. Committees
• Terminal MS Degree
• Student Governance
• Program Requirements
• PhD / Research
• Data Science & Analytics
• Health Data Science
• Finance & Economics
• Marketing Research & Business Analytics
• Social Science & Policy
• Admission Statistics
• Portfolio of Work
• Capstone Project
• Statistical Science Proseminar
• Primary Faculty
• Secondary Faculty
• Visiting Faculty
• Postdoctoral Fellows
• Ph.D. Students
• M.S. Students
• Theory, Methods, and Computation
• Interdisciplinary Collaborations
• Statistical Consulting Center
• Alumni Profiles
• For Current Students
• Assisting Duke Students
• StatSci Alumni Network
• Ph.D. Student - Alumni Fund
• Our Ph.D. Alums
• Our M.S. Alums
• Our Undergrad Alums
• Our Postdoc Alums
• Alumni Research Symposium

How To Write A Dissertation Or Thesis

8 straightforward steps to craft an a-grade dissertation.

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020

Writing a dissertation or thesis is not a simple task. It takes time, energy and a lot of will power to get you across the finish line. It’s not easy – but it doesn’t necessarily need to be a painful process. If you understand the big-picture process of how to write a dissertation or thesis, your research journey will be a lot smoother.  

In this post, I’m going to outline the big-picture process of how to write a high-quality dissertation or thesis, without losing your mind along the way. If you’re just starting your research, this post is perfect for you. Alternatively, if you’ve already submitted your proposal, this article which covers how to structure a dissertation might be more helpful.

How To Write A Dissertation: 8 Steps

• Clearly understand what a dissertation (or thesis) is
• Find a unique and valuable research topic
• Craft a convincing research proposal
• Write up a strong introduction chapter
• Review the existing literature and compile a literature review
• Design a rigorous research strategy and undertake your own research
• Present the findings of your research
• Draw a conclusion and discuss the implications

Step 1: Understand exactly what a dissertation is

This probably sounds like a no-brainer, but all too often, students come to us for help with their research and the underlying issue is that they don’t fully understand what a dissertation (or thesis) actually is.

So, what is a dissertation?

At its simplest, a dissertation or thesis is a formal piece of research , reflecting the standard research process . But what is the standard research process, you ask? The research process involves 4 key steps:

• Ask a very specific, well-articulated question (s) (your research topic)
• See what other researchers have said about it (if they’ve already answered it)
• If they haven’t answered it adequately, undertake your own data collection and analysis in a scientifically rigorous fashion
• Answer your original question(s), based on your analysis findings

In short, the research process is simply about asking and answering questions in a systematic fashion . This probably sounds pretty obvious, but people often think they’ve done “research”, when in fact what they have done is:

• Started with a vague, poorly articulated question
• Not taken the time to see what research has already been done regarding the question
• Collected data and opinions that support their gut and undertaken a flimsy analysis
• Drawn a shaky conclusion, based on that analysis

If you want to see the perfect example of this in action, look out for the next Facebook post where someone claims they’ve done “research”… All too often, people consider reading a few blog posts to constitute research. Its no surprise then that what they end up with is an opinion piece, not research. Okay, okay – I’ll climb off my soapbox now.

The key takeaway here is that a dissertation (or thesis) is a formal piece of research, reflecting the research process. It’s not an opinion piece , nor a place to push your agenda or try to convince someone of your position. Writing a good dissertation involves asking a question and taking a systematic, rigorous approach to answering it.

If you understand this and are comfortable leaving your opinions or preconceived ideas at the door, you’re already off to a good start!

Step 2: Find a unique, valuable research topic

As we saw, the first step of the research process is to ask a specific, well-articulated question. In other words, you need to find a research topic that asks a specific question or set of questions (these are called research questions ). Sounds easy enough, right? All you’ve got to do is identify a question or two and you’ve got a winning research topic. Well, not quite…

A good dissertation or thesis topic has a few important attributes. Specifically, a solid research topic should be:

Let’s take a closer look at these:

Attribute #1: Clear

Your research topic needs to be crystal clear about what you’re planning to research, what you want to know, and within what context. There shouldn’t be any ambiguity or vagueness about what you’ll research.

Here’s an example of a clearly articulated research topic:

An analysis of consumer-based factors influencing organisational trust in British low-cost online equity brokerage firms.

As you can see in the example, its crystal clear what will be analysed (factors impacting organisational trust), amongst who (consumers) and in what context (British low-cost equity brokerage firms, based online).

Need a helping hand?

Attribute #2:   Unique

Your research should be asking a question(s) that hasn’t been asked before, or that hasn’t been asked in a specific context (for example, in a specific country or industry).

For example, sticking organisational trust topic above, it’s quite likely that organisational trust factors in the UK have been investigated before, but the context (online low-cost equity brokerages) could make this research unique. Therefore, the context makes this research original.

One caveat when using context as the basis for originality – you need to have a good reason to suspect that your findings in this context might be different from the existing research – otherwise, there’s no reason to warrant researching it.

Attribute #3: Important

Simply asking a unique or original question is not enough – the question needs to create value. In other words, successfully answering your research questions should provide some value to the field of research or the industry. You can’t research something just to satisfy your curiosity. It needs to make some form of contribution either to research or industry.

For example, researching the factors influencing consumer trust would create value by enabling businesses to tailor their operations and marketing to leverage factors that promote trust. In other words, it would have a clear benefit to industry.

So, how do you go about finding a unique and valuable research topic? We explain that in detail in this video post – How To Find A Research Topic . Yeah, we’ve got you covered 😊

Step 3: Write a convincing research proposal

Once you’ve pinned down a high-quality research topic, the next step is to convince your university to let you research it. No matter how awesome you think your topic is, it still needs to get the rubber stamp before you can move forward with your research. The research proposal is the tool you’ll use for this job.

So, what’s in a research proposal?

The main “job” of a research proposal is to convince your university, advisor or committee that your research topic is worthy of approval. But convince them of what? Well, this varies from university to university, but generally, they want to see that:

• You have a clearly articulated, unique and important topic (this might sound familiar…)
• You’ve done some initial reading of the existing literature relevant to your topic (i.e. a literature review)
• You have a provisional plan in terms of how you will collect data and analyse it (i.e. a methodology)

At the proposal stage, it’s (generally) not expected that you’ve extensively reviewed the existing literature , but you will need to show that you’ve done enough reading to identify a clear gap for original (unique) research. Similarly, they generally don’t expect that you have a rock-solid research methodology mapped out, but you should have an idea of whether you’ll be undertaking qualitative or quantitative analysis , and how you’ll collect your data (we’ll discuss this in more detail later).

Long story short – don’t stress about having every detail of your research meticulously thought out at the proposal stage – this will develop as you progress through your research. However, you do need to show that you’ve “done your homework” and that your research is worthy of approval .

So, how do you go about crafting a high-quality, convincing proposal? We cover that in detail in this video post – How To Write A Top-Class Research Proposal . We’ve also got a video walkthrough of two proposal examples here .

Step 4: Craft a strong introduction chapter

Once your proposal’s been approved, its time to get writing your actual dissertation or thesis! The good news is that if you put the time into crafting a high-quality proposal, you’ve already got a head start on your first three chapters – introduction, literature review and methodology – as you can use your proposal as the basis for these.

Handy sidenote – our free dissertation & thesis template is a great way to speed up your dissertation writing journey.

What’s the introduction chapter all about?

The purpose of the introduction chapter is to set the scene for your research (dare I say, to introduce it…) so that the reader understands what you’ll be researching and why it’s important. In other words, it covers the same ground as the research proposal in that it justifies your research topic.

What goes into the introduction chapter?

This can vary slightly between universities and degrees, but generally, the introduction chapter will include the following:

• A brief background to the study, explaining the overall area of research
• A problem statement , explaining what the problem is with the current state of research (in other words, where the knowledge gap exists)
• Your research questions – in other words, the specific questions your study will seek to answer (based on the knowledge gap)
• The significance of your study – in other words, why it’s important and how its findings will be useful in the world

As you can see, this all about explaining the “what” and the “why” of your research (as opposed to the “how”). So, your introduction chapter is basically the salesman of your study, “selling” your research to the first-time reader and (hopefully) getting them interested to read more.

How do I write the introduction chapter, you ask? We cover that in detail in this post .

Step 5: Undertake an in-depth literature review

As I mentioned earlier, you’ll need to do some initial review of the literature in Steps 2 and 3 to find your research gap and craft a convincing research proposal – but that’s just scratching the surface. Once you reach the literature review stage of your dissertation or thesis, you need to dig a lot deeper into the existing research and write up a comprehensive literature review chapter.

What’s the literature review all about?

There are two main stages in the literature review process:

Literature Review Step 1: Reading up

The first stage is for you to deep dive into the existing literature (journal articles, textbook chapters, industry reports, etc) to gain an in-depth understanding of the current state of research regarding your topic. While you don’t need to read every single article, you do need to ensure that you cover all literature that is related to your core research questions, and create a comprehensive catalogue of that literature , which you’ll use in the next step.

Reading and digesting all the relevant literature is a time consuming and intellectually demanding process. Many students underestimate just how much work goes into this step, so make sure that you allocate a good amount of time for this when planning out your research. Thankfully, there are ways to fast track the process – be sure to check out this article covering how to read journal articles quickly .

Literature Review Step 2: Writing up

Once you’ve worked through the literature and digested it all, you’ll need to write up your literature review chapter. Many students make the mistake of thinking that the literature review chapter is simply a summary of what other researchers have said. While this is partly true, a literature review is much more than just a summary. To pull off a good literature review chapter, you’ll need to achieve at least 3 things:

• You need to synthesise the existing research , not just summarise it. In other words, you need to show how different pieces of theory fit together, what’s agreed on by researchers, what’s not.
• You need to highlight a research gap that your research is going to fill. In other words, you’ve got to outline the problem so that your research topic can provide a solution.
• You need to use the existing research to inform your methodology and approach to your own research design. For example, you might use questions or Likert scales from previous studies in your your own survey design .

As you can see, a good literature review is more than just a summary of the published research. It’s the foundation on which your own research is built, so it deserves a lot of love and attention. Take the time to craft a comprehensive literature review with a suitable structure .

But, how do I actually write the literature review chapter, you ask? We cover that in detail in this video post .

Step 6: Carry out your own research

Once you’ve completed your literature review and have a sound understanding of the existing research, its time to develop your own research (finally!). You’ll design this research specifically so that you can find the answers to your unique research question.

There are two steps here – designing your research strategy and executing on it:

1 – Design your research strategy

The first step is to design your research strategy and craft a methodology chapter . I won’t get into the technicalities of the methodology chapter here, but in simple terms, this chapter is about explaining the “how” of your research. If you recall, the introduction and literature review chapters discussed the “what” and the “why”, so it makes sense that the next point to cover is the “how” –that’s what the methodology chapter is all about.

In this section, you’ll need to make firm decisions about your research design. This includes things like:

• Your research philosophy (e.g. positivism or interpretivism )
• Your overall methodology (e.g. qualitative , quantitative or mixed methods)
• Your data collection strategy (e.g. interviews , focus groups, surveys)
• Your data analysis strategy (e.g. content analysis , correlation analysis, regression)

If these words have got your head spinning, don’t worry! We’ll explain these in plain language in other posts. It’s not essential that you understand the intricacies of research design (yet!). The key takeaway here is that you’ll need to make decisions about how you’ll design your own research, and you’ll need to describe (and justify) your decisions in your methodology chapter.

2 – Execute: Collect and analyse your data

Once you’ve worked out your research design, you’ll put it into action and start collecting your data. This might mean undertaking interviews, hosting an online survey or any other data collection method. Data collection can take quite a bit of time (especially if you host in-person interviews), so be sure to factor sufficient time into your project plan for this. Oftentimes, things don’t go 100% to plan (for example, you don’t get as many survey responses as you hoped for), so bake a little extra time into your budget here.

Once you’ve collected your data, you’ll need to do some data preparation before you can sink your teeth into the analysis. For example:

• If you carry out interviews or focus groups, you’ll need to transcribe your audio data to text (i.e. a Word document).
• If you collect quantitative survey data, you’ll need to clean up your data and get it into the right format for whichever analysis software you use (for example, SPSS, R or STATA).

Once you’ve completed your data prep, you’ll undertake your analysis, using the techniques that you described in your methodology. Depending on what you find in your analysis, you might also do some additional forms of analysis that you hadn’t planned for. For example, you might see something in the data that raises new questions or that requires clarification with further analysis.

The type(s) of analysis that you’ll use depend entirely on the nature of your research and your research questions. For example:

• If your research if exploratory in nature, you’ll often use qualitative analysis techniques .
• If your research is confirmatory in nature, you’ll often use quantitative analysis techniques
• If your research involves a mix of both, you might use a mixed methods approach

Again, if these words have got your head spinning, don’t worry! We’ll explain these concepts and techniques in other posts. The key takeaway is simply that there’s no “one size fits all” for research design and methodology – it all depends on your topic, your research questions and your data. So, don’t be surprised if your study colleagues take a completely different approach to yours.

Step 7: Present your findings

Once you’ve completed your analysis, it’s time to present your findings (finally!). In a dissertation or thesis, you’ll typically present your findings in two chapters – the results chapter and the discussion chapter .

What’s the difference between the results chapter and the discussion chapter?

While these two chapters are similar, the results chapter generally just presents the processed data neatly and clearly without interpretation, while the discussion chapter explains the story the data are telling  – in other words, it provides your interpretation of the results.

For example, if you were researching the factors that influence consumer trust, you might have used a quantitative approach to identify the relationship between potential factors (e.g. perceived integrity and competence of the organisation) and consumer trust. In this case:

• Your results chapter would just present the results of the statistical tests. For example, correlation results or differences between groups. In other words, the processed numbers.
• Your discussion chapter would explain what the numbers mean in relation to your research question(s). For example, Factor 1 has a weak relationship with consumer trust, while Factor 2 has a strong relationship.

Depending on the university and degree, these two chapters (results and discussion) are sometimes merged into one , so be sure to check with your institution what their preference is. Regardless of the chapter structure, this section is about presenting the findings of your research in a clear, easy to understand fashion.

Importantly, your discussion here needs to link back to your research questions (which you outlined in the introduction or literature review chapter). In other words, it needs to answer the key questions you asked (or at least attempt to answer them).

For example, if we look at the sample research topic:

In this case, the discussion section would clearly outline which factors seem to have a noteworthy influence on organisational trust. By doing so, they are answering the overarching question and fulfilling the purpose of the research .

For more information about the results chapter , check out this post for qualitative studies and this post for quantitative studies .

Step 8: The Final Step Draw a conclusion and discuss the implications

Last but not least, you’ll need to wrap up your research with the conclusion chapter . In this chapter, you’ll bring your research full circle by highlighting the key findings of your study and explaining what the implications of these findings are.

What exactly are key findings? The key findings are those findings which directly relate to your original research questions and overall research objectives (which you discussed in your introduction chapter). The implications, on the other hand, explain what your findings mean for industry, or for research in your area.

Sticking with the consumer trust topic example, the conclusion might look something like this:

Key findings

This study set out to identify which factors influence consumer-based trust in British low-cost online equity brokerage firms. The results suggest that the following factors have a large impact on consumer trust:

While the following factors have a very limited impact on consumer trust:

Notably, within the 25-30 age groups, Factors E had a noticeably larger impact, which may be explained by…

Implications

The findings having noteworthy implications for British low-cost online equity brokers. Specifically:

The large impact of Factors X and Y implies that brokers need to consider….

The limited impact of Factor E implies that brokers need to…

As you can see, the conclusion chapter is basically explaining the “what” (what your study found) and the “so what?” (what the findings mean for the industry or research). This brings the study full circle and closes off the document.

Let’s recap – how to write a dissertation or thesis

You’re still with me? Impressive! I know that this post was a long one, but hopefully you’ve learnt a thing or two about how to write a dissertation or thesis, and are now better equipped to start your own research.

To recap, the 8 steps to writing a quality dissertation (or thesis) are as follows:

• Understand what a dissertation (or thesis) is – a research project that follows the research process.
• Find a unique (original) and important research topic
• Craft a convincing dissertation or thesis research proposal
• Write a clear, compelling introduction chapter
• Undertake a thorough review of the existing research and write up a literature review
• Undertake your own research
• Present and interpret your findings

Once you’ve wrapped up the core chapters, all that’s typically left is the abstract , reference list and appendices. As always, be sure to check with your university if they have any additional requirements in terms of structure or content.  

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

20 Comments

thankfull >>>this is very useful

Thank you, it was really helpful

unquestionably, this amazing simplified way of teaching. Really , I couldn’t find in the literature words that fully explicit my great thanks to you. However, I could only say thanks a-lot.

Great to hear that – thanks for the feedback. Good luck writing your dissertation/thesis.

This is the most comprehensive explanation of how to write a dissertation. Many thanks for sharing it free of charge.

Very rich presentation. Thank you

Thanks Derek Jansen|GRADCOACH, I find it very useful guide to arrange my activities and proceed to research!

Thank you so much for such a marvelous teaching .I am so convinced that am going to write a comprehensive and a distinct masters dissertation

It is an amazing comprehensive explanation

This was straightforward. Thank you!

I can say that your explanations are simple and enlightening – understanding what you have done here is easy for me. Could you write more about the different types of research methods specific to the three methodologies: quan, qual and MM. I look forward to interacting with this website more in the future.

Thanks for the feedback and suggestions 🙂

Hello, your write ups is quite educative. However, l have challenges in going about my research questions which is below; *Building the enablers of organisational growth through effective governance and purposeful leadership.*

Very educating.

Just listening to the name of the dissertation makes the student nervous. As writing a top-quality dissertation is a difficult task as it is a lengthy topic, requires a lot of research and understanding and is usually around 10,000 to 15000 words. Sometimes due to studies, unbalanced workload or lack of research and writing skill students look for dissertation submission from professional writers.

Thank you 💕😊 very much. I was confused but your comprehensive explanation has cleared my doubts of ever presenting a good thesis. Thank you.

thank you so much, that was so useful

Hi. Where is the excel spread sheet ark?

could you please help me look at your thesis paper to enable me to do the portion that has to do with the specification

my topic is “the impact of domestic revenue mobilization.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• Weblog home

International Students blog

Thesis life: 7 ways to tackle statistics in your thesis.

By Pranav Kulkarni

Thesis is an integral part of your Masters’ study in Wageningen University and Research. It is the most exciting, independent and technical part of the study. More often than not, most departments in WU expect students to complete a short term independent project or a part of big on-going project for their thesis assignment.

Source : www.coursera.org

This assignment involves proposing a research question, tackling it with help of some observations or experiments, analyzing these observations or results and then stating them by drawing some conclusions.

Since it is an immitigable part of your thesis, you can neither run from statistics nor cry for help.

The penultimate part of this process involves analysis of results which is very crucial for coherence of your thesis assignment.This analysis usually involve use of statistical tools to help draw inferences. Most students who don’t pursue statistics in their curriculum are scared by this prospect. Since it is an immitigable part of your thesis, you can neither run from statistics nor cry for help. But in order to not get intimidated by statistics and its “greco-latin” language, there are a few ways in which you can make your journey through thesis life a pleasant experience.

Make statistics your friend

The best way to end your fear of statistics and all its paraphernalia is to befriend it. Try to learn all that you can about the techniques that you will be using, why they were invented, how they were invented and who did this deed. Personifying the story of statistical techniques makes them digestible and easy to use. Each new method in statistics comes with a unique story and loads of nerdy anecdotes.

If you cannot make friends with statistics, at least make a truce

If you cannot still bring yourself about to be interested in the life and times of statistics, the best way to not hate statistics is to make an agreement with yourself. You must realise that although important, this is only part of your thesis. The better part of your thesis is something you trained for and learned. So, don’t bother to fuss about statistics and make you all nervous. Do your job, enjoy thesis to the fullest and complete the statistical section as soon as possible. At the end, you would have forgotten all about your worries and fears of statistics.

Visualize your data

The best way to understand the results and observations from your study/ experiments, is to visualize your data. See different trends, patterns, or lack thereof to understand what you are supposed to do. Moreover, graphics and illustrations can be used directly in your report. These techniques will also help you decide on which statistical analyses you must perform to answer your research question. Blind decisions about statistics can often influence your study and make it very confusing or worse, make it completely wrong!

Simplify with flowcharts and planning

Similar to graphical visualizations, making flowcharts and planning various steps of your study can prove beneficial to make statistical decisions. Human brain can analyse pictorial information faster than literal information. So, it is always easier to understand your exact goal when you can make decisions based on flowchart or any logical flow-plans.

Source: www.imindq.com

Find examples on internet

Although statistics is a giant maze of complicated terminologies, the internet holds the key to this particular maze. You can find tons of examples on the web. These may be similar to what you intend to do or be different applications of the similar tools that you wish to engage. Especially, in case of Statistical programming languages like R, SAS, Python, PERL, VBA, etc. there is a vast database of example codes, clarifications and direct training examples available on the internet. Various forums are also available for specialized statistical methodologies where different experts and students discuss the issues regarding their own projects.

Comparative studies

Much unlike blindly searching the internet for examples and taking word of advice from online faceless people, you can systematically learn which quantitative tests to perform by rigorously studying literature of relevant research. Since you came up with a certain problem to tackle in your field of study, chances are, someone else also came up with this issue or something quite similar. You can find solutions to many such problems by scouring the internet for research papers which address the issue. Nevertheless, you should be cautious. It is easy to get lost and disheartened when you find many heavy statistical studies with lots of maths and derivations with huge cryptic symbolical text.

When all else fails, talk to an expert

All the steps above are meant to help you independently tackle whatever hurdles you encounter over the course of your thesis. But, when you cannot tackle them yourself it is always prudent and most efficient to ask for help. Talking to students from your thesis ring who have done something similar is one way of help. Another is to make an appointment with your supervisor and take specific questions to him/ her. If that is not possible, you can contact some other teaching staff or researchers from your research group. Try not to waste their as well as you time by making a list of specific problems that you will like to discuss. I think most are happy to help in any way possible.

Talking to students from your thesis ring who have done something similar is one way of help.

Sometimes, with the help of your supervisor, you can make an appointment with someone from the “Biometris” which is the WU’s statistics department. These people are the real deal; chances are, these people can solve all your problems without any difficulty. Always remember, you are in the process of learning, nobody expects you to be an expert in everything. Ask for help when there seems to be no hope.

Apart from these seven ways to make your statistical journey pleasant, you should always engage in reading, watching, listening to stuff relevant to your thesis topic and talking about it to those who are interested. Most questions have solutions in the ether realm of communication. So, best of luck and break a leg!!!

Related posts:

No related posts.

MSc Animal Science

View articles

There are 4 comments.

A perfect approach in a very crisp and clear manner! The sequence suggested is absolutely perfect and will help the students very much. I particularly liked the idea of visualisation!

You are write! I get totally stuck with learning and understanding statistics for my Dissertation!

Statistics is a technical subject that requires extra effort. With the highlighted tips you already highlighted i expect it will offer the much needed help with statistics analysis in my course.

this is so much relevant to me! Don’t forget one more point: try to enrol specific online statistics course (in my case, I’m too late to join any statistic course). The hardest part for me actually to choose what type of statistical test to choose among many options

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dissertation Proposal

Once you have a clean, comprehensive dissertation proposal, you are then on the road to completing your dissertation.  Generally, the dissertation proposal consists of Chapters 1-3: the Introduction, the Literature Review, and the Methodology.  More specifically, your dissertation proposal will need to show your committee that you have identified a purposeful and important dissertation study (part of the Introduction, Chapter 1), will fill a gap in the literature (part of the Literature Review, Chapter 2), and have a method to assess that gap (part of the Methodology, Chapter 3).  Happily, we assist Ph.D. candidates in all three chapters!

Discover How We Assist to Edit Your Dissertation Chapters

Aligning theoretical framework, gathering articles, synthesizing gaps, articulating a clear methodology and data plan, and writing about the theoretical and practical implications of your research are part of our comprehensive dissertation editing services.

• Bring dissertation editing expertise to chapters 1-5 in timely manner.
• Track all changes, then work with you to bring about scholarly writing.
• Ongoing support to address committee feedback, reducing revisions.

In the Introduction , we assist you in identifying and articulating your research problem, describing your study’s theoretical construct, and clearly explaining the nature of your study.  You also have access to an editor who makes sure the statement of the problem is clear, and that your study’s rationale, significance, and research questions and hypotheses are stated concisely.  Typically, our experts suggest concluding the Introduction with a clear outline of your study’s assumptions, limitations, and delimitations.

Now, in the Literature Review , we guide your approach using our best practices for effectively searching, selecting, organizing, and summarizing articles.  Naturally, these best practices lead into how to present a well-curated Literature Review that tells a story and explicitly supports your research questions.  Importantly, together we will ensure that the gap in the literature is clearly stated and aligns with your problem statement.  As icing on the cake, our assistance includes a critique of the previous literature, wherein we replace and update articles as necessary.

Finally, in the Methodology section, we help you select and discuss the most suitable research design for your study, ultimately finalizing with you the necessary steps you will follow to carry out your qualitative or quantitative study.  This final output will include a discussion of your study’s target population, its sampling method, the instrument you will use, your study’s data analysis procedures, the limitations of the research design, any internal and external validity considerations, along with ethical issues and expected findings.  In short, we ensure that each section is comprehensive and quickly gains approval!

To learn more about dissertation proposal assistance , call 877-437-8622, fill out our  contact form , or email  [email protected] .

Additional Resources on Dissertation Proposal

• Methods Section: Chapter Three
• Literature Review
• Sample Size/Power Analysis
• Survey Help and Analysis

Statistical Methods in Theses: Guidelines and Explanations

Signed August 2018 Naseem Al-Aidroos, PhD, Christopher Fiacconi, PhD Deborah Powell, PhD, Harvey Marmurek, PhD, Ian Newby-Clark, PhD, Jeffrey Spence, PhD, David Stanley, PhD, Lana Trick, PhD

Version:  2.00

This document is an organizational aid, and workbook, for students. We encourage students to take this document to meetings with their advisor and committee. This guide should enhance a committee’s ability to assess key areas of a student’s work. 

In recent years a number of well-known and apparently well-established findings have  failed to replicate , resulting in what is commonly referred to as the replication crisis. The APA Publication Manual 6 th Edition notes that “The essence of the scientific method involves observations that can be repeated and verified by others.” (p. 12). However, a systematic investigation of the replicability of psychology findings published in  Science  revealed that over half of psychology findings do not replicate (see a related commentary in  Nature ). Even more disturbing, a  Bayesian reanalysis of the reproducibility project  showed that 64% of studies had sample sizes so small that strong evidence for or against the null or alternative hypotheses did not exist. Indeed, Morey and Lakens (2016) concluded that most of psychology is statistically unfalsifiable due to small sample sizes and correspondingly low power (see  article ). Our discipline’s reputation is suffering. News of the replication crisis has reached the popular press (e.g.,  The Atlantic ,   The Economist ,   Slate , Last Week Tonight ).

An increasing number of psychologists have responded by promoting new research standards that involve open science and the elimination of  Questionable Research Practices . The open science perspective is made manifest in the  Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines  for journal publications. These guidelines were adopted some time ago by the  Association for Psychological Science . More recently, the guidelines were adopted by American Psychological Association journals ( see details ) and journals published by Elsevier ( see details ). It appears likely that, in the very near future, most journals in psychology will be using an open science approach. We strongly advise readers to take a moment to inspect the  TOP Guidelines Summary Table . 

A key aspect of open science and the TOP guidelines is the sharing of data associated with published research (with respect to medical research, see point #35 in the  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ). This practice is viewed widely as highly important. Indeed, open science is recommended by  all G7 science ministers . All Tri-Agency grants must include a data-management plan that includes plans for sharing: “ research data resulting from agency funding should normally be preserved in a publicly accessible, secure and curated repository or other platform for discovery and reuse by others.”  Moreover, a 2017 editorial published in the  New England Journal of Medicine announced that the  International Committee of Medical Journal Editors believes there is  “an ethical obligation to responsibly share data.”  As of this writing,  60% of highly ranked psychology journals require or encourage data sharing .

The increasing importance of demonstrating that findings are replicable is reflected in calls to make replication a requirement for the promotion of faculty (see details in  Nature ) and experts in open science are now refereeing applications for tenure and promotion (see details at the  Center for Open Science  and  this article ). Most dramatically, in one instance, a paper resulting from a dissertation was retracted due to misleading findings attributable to Questionable Research Practices. Subsequent to the retraction, the Ohio State University’s Board of Trustees unanimously revoked the PhD of the graduate student who wrote the dissertation ( see details ). Thus, the academic environment is changing and it is important to work toward using new best practices in lieu of older practices—many of which are synonymous with Questionable Research Practices. Doing so should help you avoid later career regrets and subsequent  public mea culpas . One way to achieve your research objectives in this new academic environment is  to incorporate replications into your research . Replications are becoming more common and there are even websites dedicated to helping students conduct replications (e.g.,  Psychology Science Accelerator ) and indexing the success of replications (e.g., Curate Science ). You might even consider conducting a replication for your thesis (subject to committee approval).

As early-career researchers, it is important to be aware of the changing academic environment. Senior principal investigators may be  reluctant to engage in open science  (see this student perspective in a  blog post  and  podcast ) and research on resistance to data sharing indicates that one of the barriers to sharing data is that researchers do not feel that they have knowledge of  how to share data online . This document is an educational aid and resource to provide students with introductory knowledge of how to participate in open science and online data sharing to start their education on these subjects. 

Guidelines and Explanations

In light of the changes in psychology, faculty members who teach statistics/methods have reviewed the literature and generated this guide for graduate students. The guide is intended to enhance the quality of student theses by facilitating their engagement in open and transparent research practices and by helping them avoid Questionable Research Practices, many of which are now deemed unethical and covered in the ethics section of textbooks.

This document is an informational tool.

How to Start

In order to follow best practices, some first steps need to be followed. Here is a list of things to do:

• Get an Open Science account. Registration at  osf.io  is easy!
• If conducting confirmatory hypothesis testing for your thesis, pre-register your hypotheses (see Section 1-Hypothesizing). The Open Science Foundation website has helpful  tutorials  and  guides  to get you going.
• Also, pre-register your data analysis plan. Pre-registration typically includes how and when you will stop collecting data, how you will deal with violations of statistical assumptions and points of influence (“outliers”), the specific measures you will use, and the analyses you will use to test each hypothesis, possibly including the analysis script. Again, there is a lot of help available for this. 

Exploratory and Confirmatory Research Are Both of Value, But Do Not Confuse the Two

We note that this document largely concerns confirmatory research (i.e., testing hypotheses). We by no means intend to devalue exploratory research. Indeed, it is one of the primary ways that hypotheses are generated for (possible) confirmation. Instead, we emphasize that it is important that you clearly indicate what of your research is exploratory and what is confirmatory. Be clear in your writing and in your preregistration plan. You should explicitly indicate which of your analyses are exploratory and which are confirmatory. Please note also that if you are engaged in exploratory research, then Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) should probably be avoided (see rationale in  Gigerenzer  (2004) and  Wagenmakers et al., (2012) ). 

This document is structured around the stages of thesis work:  hypothesizing, design, data collection, analyses, and reporting – consistent with the headings used by Wicherts et al. (2016). We also list the Questionable Research Practices associated with each stage and provide suggestions for avoiding them. We strongly advise going through all of these sections during thesis/dissertation proposal meetings because a priori decisions need to be made prior to data collection (including analysis decisions). 

To help to ensure that the student has informed the committee about key decisions at each stage, there are check boxes at the end of each section.

How to Use This Document in a Proposal Meeting

• Print off a copy of this document and take it to the proposal meeting.
• During the meeting, use the document to seek assistance from faculty to address potential problems.
• Revisit responses to issues raised by this document (especially the Analysis and Reporting Stages) when you are seeking approval to proceed to defense.

Consultation and Help Line

Note that the Center for Open Science now has a help line (for individual researchers and labs) you can call for help with open science issues. They also have training workshops. Please see their  website  for details.

• Hypothesizing
• Data Collection
• Printer-friendly version
• PDF version

Doctoral Program

Program summary.

Students are required to

• master the material in the prerequisite courses ;
• pass the first-year core program;
• attempt all three parts of the qualifying examinations and show acceptable performance in at least two of them (end of 1st year);
• satisfy the depth and breadth requirements (2nd/3rd/4th year);
• successfully complete the thesis proposal meeting and submit the Dissertation Reading Committee form (winter quarter of the 3rd year);
• present a draft of their dissertation and pass the university oral examination (4th/5th year).

The PhD requires a minimum of 135 units. Students are required to take a minimum of nine units of advanced topics courses (for depth) offered by the department (not including literature, research, consulting or Year 1 coursework), and a minimum of nine units outside of the Statistics Department (for breadth). Courses for the depth and breadth requirements must equal a combined minimum of 24 units. In addition, students must enroll in STATS 390 Statistical Consulting, taking it at least twice.

All students who have passed the qualifying exams but have not yet passed the Thesis Proposal Meeting must take STATS 319 at least once each year. For example, a student taking the qualifying exams in the summer after Year 1 and having the dissertation proposal meeting in Year 3, would take 319 in Years 2 and 3. Students in their second year are strongly encouraged to take STATS 399 with at least one faculty member. All details of program requirements can be found in our PhD handbook (available to Stanford affiliates only, using Stanford authentication. Requests for access from non-affiliates will not be approved).

Statistics Department PhD Handbook

All students are expected to abide by the Honor Code and the Fundamental Standard .

Doctoral and Research Advisors

During the first two years of the program, students' academic progress is monitored by the department's Graduate Director. Each student should meet at least once a quarter with the Graduate Director to discuss their academic plans and their progress towards choosing a thesis advisor (before the final study list deadline of spring of the second year). From the third year onward students are advised by their selected advisor.

Qualifying Examinations

Qualifying examinations are part of most PhD programs in the United States. At Stanford these exams are intended to test the student's level of knowledge when the first-year program, common to all students, has been completed. There are separate examinations in the three core subjects of statistical theory and methods, applied statistics, and probability theory, which are typically taken during the summer at the end of the student's first year. Students are expected to attempt all three examinations and show acceptable performance in at least two of them. Letter grades are not given. Qualifying exams may be taken only once. After passing the qualifying exams, students must file for Ph.D. Candidacy, a university milestone, by the end of spring quarter of their second year.

While nearly all students pass the qualifying examinations, those who do not can arrange to have their financial support continued for up to three quarters while alternative plans are made. Usually students are able to complete the requirements for the M.S. degree in Statistics in two years or less, whether or not they have passed the PhD qualifying exams.

Thesis Proposal Meeting and Dissertation Reading Committee 

The thesis proposal meeting is intended to demonstrate a student's depth in some areas of statistics, and to examine the general plan for their research. In the meeting the student gives a 60-minute presentation involving ideas developed to date and plans for completing a PhD dissertation, and for another 60 minutes answers questions posed by the committee. which consists of their advisor and two other members. The meeting must be successfully completed by the end of winter quarter of the third year. If a student does not pass, the exam must be repeated. Repeated failure can lead to a loss of financial support.

The Dissertation Reading Committee consists of the student’s advisor plus two faculty readers, all of whom are responsible for reading the full dissertation. Of these three, at least two must be members of the Statistics Department (faculty with a full or joint appointment in Statistics but excluding for this purpose those with only a courtesy or adjunct appointment). Normally, all committee members are members of the Stanford University Academic Council or are emeritus Academic Council members; the principal dissertation advisor must be an Academic Council member. 

The Doctoral Dissertation Reading Committee form should be completed and signed at the Dissertation Proposal Meeting. The form must be submitted before approval of TGR status or before scheduling a University Oral Examination.

 For further information on the Dissertation Reading Committee, please see the Graduate Academic Policies and Procedures (GAP) Handbook section 4.8.

University Oral Examinations

The oral examination consists of a public, approximately 60-minute, presentation on the thesis topic, followed by a 60 minute question and answer period attended only by members of the examining committee. The questions relate to the student's presentation and also explore the student's familiarity with broader statistical topics related to the thesis research. The oral examination is normally completed during the last few months of the student's PhD period. The examining committee typically consists of four faculty members from the Statistics Department and a fifth faculty member from outside the department serving as the committee chair. Four out of five passing votes are required and no grades are given. Nearly all students can expect to pass this examination, although it is common for specific recommendations to be made regarding completion of the thesis.

The Dissertation Reading Committee must also read and approve the thesis.

For further information on university oral examinations and committees, please see the Graduate Academic Policies and Procedures (GAP) Handbook section 4.7 .

Dissertation

The dissertation is the capstone of the PhD degree. It is expected to be an original piece of work of publishable quality. The research advisor and two additional faculty members constitute the student's dissertation reading committee.

How to Write a Research Proposal: (with Examples & Templates)

Table of Contents

Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.  

Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.  

This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.  

What is a Research Proposal ?  

A research proposal¹ ,²  can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.   

With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.  

Purpose of Research Proposals  

A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.  

Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³  

• To describe the importance of research in the specific topic  
• Address any potential challenges you may encounter  
• Showcase knowledge in the field and your ability to conduct a study  
• Apply for a role at a research institute  
• Convince a research supervisor or university that your research can satisfy the requirements of a degree program  
• Highlight the importance of your research to organizations that may sponsor your project  
• Identify implications of your project and how it can benefit the audience  

What Goes in a Research Proposal?    

Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.  

The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.  

The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.  

The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.   

Research Proposal Example  

Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.  

Structure of a Research Proposal  

If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹  

1. Introduction  

This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.  

2. Literature review  

This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.  

3. Objectives  

Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.  

4. Research design and methodology  

Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.  

5. Ethical considerations  

This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.  

6. Budget/funding  

Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.  

7. Appendices  

This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.  

8. Citations  

Important Tips for Writing a Research Proposal  

Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5  

The Planning Stage  

• Manage your time efficiently. Plan to have the draft version ready at least two weeks before your deadline and the final version at least two to three days before the deadline.
• What is the primary objective of your research?  
• Will your research address any existing gap?  
• What is the impact of your proposed research?  
• Do people outside your field find your research applicable in other areas?  
• If your research is unsuccessful, would there still be other useful research outcomes?  

  The Writing Stage  

• Create an outline with main section headings that are typically used.  
• Focus only on writing and getting your points across without worrying about the format of the research proposal , grammar, punctuation, etc. These can be fixed during the subsequent passes. Add details to each section heading you created in the beginning.   
• Ensure your sentences are concise and use plain language. A research proposal usually contains about 2,000 to 4,000 words or four to seven pages.  
• Don’t use too many technical terms and abbreviations assuming that the readers would know them. Define the abbreviations and technical terms.  
• Ensure that the entire content is readable. Avoid using long paragraphs because they affect the continuity in reading. Break them into shorter paragraphs and introduce some white space for readability.  
• Focus on only the major research issues and cite sources accordingly. Don’t include generic information or their sources in the literature review.  
• Proofread your final document to ensure there are no grammatical errors so readers can enjoy a seamless, uninterrupted read.  
• Use academic, scholarly language because it brings formality into a document.  
• Ensure that your title is created using the keywords in the document and is neither too long and specific nor too short and general.  
• Cite all sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism.  
• Make sure that you follow guidelines, if provided. This includes rules as simple as using a specific font or a hyphen or en dash between numerical ranges.  
• Ensure that you’ve answered all questions requested by the evaluating authority.  

Key Takeaways   

Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:  

• A research proposal is a document that outlines the details of a proposed study and is created by researchers to submit to evaluators who could be research institutions, universities, faculty, etc.  
• Research proposals are usually about 2,000-4,000 words long, but this depends on the evaluating authority’s guidelines.  
• A good research proposal ensures that you’ve done your background research and assessed the feasibility of the research.  
• Research proposals have the following main sections—introduction, literature review, objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and budget.  

Frequently Asked Questions  

Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?  

A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6  

• Significance —Does the research address any important subject or issue, which may or may not be specific to the evaluator or university?  
• Content and design —Is the proposed methodology appropriate to answer the research question? Are the objectives clear and well aligned with the proposed methodology?  
• Sample size and selection —Is the target population or cohort size clearly mentioned? Is the sampling process used to select participants randomized, appropriate, and free of bias?  
• Timing —Are the proposed data collection dates mentioned clearly? Is the project feasible given the specified resources and timeline?  
• Data management and dissemination —Who will have access to the data? What is the plan for data analysis?  

Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?  

A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.  

Q3. How long should a research proposal be?  

A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.  

Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?  

A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7  

• No clear objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable for the easy understanding among readers.  
• Incomplete or unconvincing background research: Background research usually includes a review of the current scenario of the particular industry and also a review of the previous literature on the subject. This helps readers understand your reasons for undertaking this research because you identified gaps in the existing research.  
• Overlooking project feasibility: The project scope and estimates should be realistic considering the resources and time available.   
• Neglecting the impact and significance of the study: In a research proposal , readers and evaluators look for the implications or significance of your research and how it contributes to the existing research. This information should always be included.  
• Unstructured format of a research proposal : A well-structured document gives confidence to evaluators that you have read the guidelines carefully and are well organized in your approach, consequently affirming that you will be able to undertake the research as mentioned in your proposal.  
• Ineffective writing style: The language used should be formal and grammatically correct. If required, editors could be consulted, including AI-based tools such as Paperpal , to refine the research proposal structure and language.  

Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.  

This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.  

References  

• Sudheesh K, Duggappa DR, Nethra SS. How to write a research proposal? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):631-634. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037942/  
• Writing research proposals. Harvard College Office of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships. Harvard University. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://uraf.harvard.edu/apply-opportunities/app-components/essays/research-proposals  
• What is a research proposal? Plus how to write one. Indeed website. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/research-proposal  
• Research proposal template. University of Rochester Medical Center. Accessed July 16, 2024. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/MediaLibraries/URMCMedia/pediatrics/research/documents/Research-proposal-Template.pdf  
• Tips for successful proposal writing. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed July 17, 2024. https://research.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tips-for-Successful-Proposal-Writing.pdf  
• Formal review of research proposals. Cornell University. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/surveys/survey-assessment-review-group/research-proposals  
• 7 Mistakes you must avoid in your research proposal. Aveksana (via LinkedIn). Accessed July 17, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/7-mistakes-you-must-avoid-your-research-proposal-aveksana-cmtwf/  

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

• How to Paraphrase Research Papers Effectively
• How to Cite Social Media Sources in Academic Writing? 
• What is the Importance of a Concept Paper and How to Write It 

APA format: Basic Guide for Researchers

The future of academia: how ai tools are changing the way we do research, you may also like, the ai revolution: authors’ role in upholding academic..., the future of academia: how ai tools are..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), five things authors need to know when using..., 7 best referencing tools and citation management software..., maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal....

Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice .

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences

Department of Statistics

Ph.d. dissertation.

Students pursuing a Ph.D. in statistics are required to take two qualifying examinations, prepare a dissertation, and defend their dissertation before they can earn their degree.

Examinations

Ph.D. students are required to pass the following two examinations:

• Ph.D. qualifying examination, which is a written test for certain basic courses in the program.
• General examination , which is an oral test that covers aspects of applied statistics, linear models, probability theory, and statistics. Contains a dissertation proposal.

Please note: In order for a student currently enrolled in our MS program to switch to the Ph.D. program or to be considered for financial support, they must first pass both parts of the Ph.D. qualifying exam at the Ph.D. level.

Dissertation and Defense

Students are also required to prepare a dissertation, which must present an original contribution to the general area of statistics and/or probability. A Ph.D. degree must include at least 15 credits of GRAD 6950. Doctoral Dissertation Research .

Once complete, Ph.D. students must present a defense of their dissertation before an audience of interested members of the Department.

For students arriving with a bachelor’s degree and receiving financial support from the Department, students should follow the following suggested timetable:

• Ph.D. qualifying examination - within three semesters from the start of the program.
• General Examination - within six semesters from the start of the program.
• Ph.D. thesis defense - no later than five years from the start of the program.

Resources and Notes

The Registrar’s web page on doctoral degrees contains all relevant information and forms that students need to prepare for their dissertations and plan their academic careers.

Please note the following:

• Doctoral students no longer need to complete and submit a Tentative Approval Page to the Registrar’s Office, the Graduate School, or Degree Audit.
• Ph.D. students are required to announce their defense on the University Events Calendar at least two weeks prior to the defense date. Visit the Registrar’s web page on doctoral degrees for instructions on how to post your defense announcement.
• Survey of Earned Doctorates Completion Certificate.
• Dissertation   Approval Page (the approval page will be routed to the Registrar's office when the final committee approval is submitted).
• Submit ONE electronic copy of your dissertation to   Submittable . Follow the instructions found in the   Submittable help file .

We appreciate your financial support. Your gift is important to us and helps support critical opportunities for students and faculty alike, including lectures, travel support, and any number of educational events that augment the classroom experience. Click here to learn more about giving.

Every dollar given has a direct impact upon our students and faculty.

Thesis/Project Option

Getting started.

NEW FOR 2022-2023!!!: HOW TO NAVIGATE THE THESIS PATHWAY -by Applied Statistics Faculty

With the consultation of your professors and other students close to the conclusion of their program, you should decide whether you would like to pursue a thesis, project, or comprehensive exam as your culminating activity. Keep in mind that those who choose to pursue the thesis or project options must earn a minimum of a B grade in each of the core courses: STAT 510, 520, and 530. As usual, all regulations and procedures regarding these options can be found in the current CSULB Catalog. The department of Mathematics and Statistics website also provides some guidance .

Once you decide on thesis/project, your next step is to determine which topic you would like to pursue. This decision, along with working relationships you have with your professors will inform who you should ask to consider serving as your research advisor . You will consult with your advisor to determine which two other professors will form the committee of three.

Your advisor will work with you to create an abstract, which is a summary of the problem you would like to solve or data you intend to investigate, methods you propose to use, and anticipated results.

Once the abstract is created and the committee formed, you will fill out the Thesis/Project and 698 application form , and your advisor will forward to the Applied Statistics graduate advisor for approval by the STAT committee. Upon approval, you should immediately advance to candidacy and submit your declaration form with the advancement paperwork.

Everyone who chooses to write a thesis/project as their culminating activity must enroll in a minimum of 3 units of STAT 698: Thesis or Project , which must appear on your advancement to candidacy form. YOU MUST NOT REGISTER FOR STAT 698 UNTIL ALL YOUR FORMS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED!!!

Thesis Option

A thesis provides students with an opportunity to investigate a complex or big data set, or explore a theoretical problem at a level that goes above and beyond the scope of any one course taken in the program. Most theses will cause you to synthesize methods from a number of courses, compare and contrast results, and deepen your discovery by incorporating techniques and theory not covered in the applied statistics curriculum. It is important that you work closely with your advisor to determine the scope of the project so that your work is neither too basic nor too ambitious.

Project Option

Similar to a thesis, a project involves incorporating methods and techniques at a level of sophistication beyond material covered in courses. The key difference is that the student embarking on the project must be a current employee of a company that stands to benefit from the completion of the project. The project advisor must be a member of the CSULB Applied Statistics faculty. In addition,

1. The student must submit a letter to their project advisor that indicates the specific benefit the project will have for the company.

2. The student must give an oral proposal of their project before the STAT committee, and attain approval before they can proceed with work on the project.

Suggested Thesis/Project Timeline

From initial proposal to final defense, theses typically take two semesters to complete.

Sample Theses

The pdf linked here lists one-page summaries of theses from students in the applied statistics program over the past several years. Each page lists the title, author, abstract, advisor, and other key information about the theses. Moreover, for most of them, you can get full-text access to the thesis as follows:

Step 1: Identify a thesis/project of interest by reading the title and abstract. Highlight and copy the ProQuest document ID number.

Step 3: The page dedicated to the thesis/project of interest will pop up, and will indicate whether full-text access is available.

Dissertation, Doctoral Project, and Thesis Information & Templates

Note: Forms required for the submission of theses and dissertations are available on the  Academic Forms  page.

Important Notes for Dissertation, Doctoral Project & Thesis Writers

• Information is available in Section IV.B.2 Research on Human Subjects of the  Graduate Bulletin   (from the  Resources and Policies page ).
• Additional information and forms are available on the   IRB website . Your IRB approval number must be included on the Thesis or Dissertation Proposal Form.
• Consult the  Guidelines for Dissertation, Doctoral Project and Thesis Writers  before beginning your thesis or dissertation.
• Download a template to assist with formatting your work. The templates are unlocked and can be edited (links to the template can be found in the “Submission Procedures” sections below).
• Check the Resources & Guidelines section of the ProQuest website for instructions on using the site. The Library has created a very informative series of  short videos  about the choices you must make on the ProQuest site.
• Additional information on copyright, publishing options and other topics is available on  Lauinger’s Scholarly Communication  website.
• More information about the requirements for dissertations, doctoral projects and theses can be found in the  Graduate Bulletin .

Submission of the Thesis, Doctoral Project or Dissertation

Information on the forms required leading up to a defense and also afterward appear on Submission of Thesis  and  Submission of Dissertation or Doctoral Project .

Download a Thesis / Doctoral Project / Dissertation Template

(for Master’s and Doctoral candidates) We recommend that you download a Thesis / Doctoral Project / Dissertation Template using Mozilla Firefox, Safari, or Google Chrome browsers. There are some reported issues for students trying to download using Internet Explorer. The download links are shown below:

• The combined  Master’s Thesis / Doctoral Project / Doctoral Dissertation Template  for MS-Word for Windows is available at: Thesis/Project/Dissertation Template-PC
• The  Master’s   Thesis Template  for Word for Mac is available at:  Thesis Template-MAC
• The  Doctoral Template  for Word for Mac is available at  Dissertation Template-MAC
• If you use the LaTeX markup language, you can download a ZIP file folder containing several template and style documents, as well as an extensive tutorial manual, at this link:  Thesis/Dissertation Template-LaTeX . An updated .sty file was uploaded in June 2020.

LaTeX users please note: These LaTeX template materials are provided for the use of those who are already proficient in the use of LaTeX. Neither the Graduate School nor the faculty who helped develop this template are able to provide support or training in the use of this specialty software.

We use cookies to make your experience on this website better.

Accept Cookies

College of Sciences and Mathematics Homepage

• Toggle Search
• Find People

“ Stratigraphic and Structural Controls on a Carbon Sequestration Reservoir in Shelby County, Alabama ”

Thesis Proposal by Bryce Hall

In the News

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

The accident rate in the construction sector: a work proposal for its reduction through the standardization of safe work processes.

1. Introduction

1.1. risk evaluation methods, 1.1.1. safety.

• The National Institute of Safety and Hygiene at Work’s method: this is based on a work activity classification where variables are analyzed, identifying dangers, considering risks, and finally appreciating whether they are tolerable or not [ 28 ].
• NTP-330, of the National Institute of Safety and Hygiene at Work method: this method tries to ease the task of evaluating risks by means of filling check surveys [ 29 ].

1.1.2. Ergonomics

• The Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method: this method evaluates individual postures and not group or posture sequences [ 30 ].
• The Ovako Working Analysis System (OWAS) method: this method allows for the assessment of physical charge derived from postures assessed during work time [ 31 ].
• The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) method: in this method, postures will be selected according to their postural charge (by means of their duration, frequency or deviation from neutral posture) [ 32 ].

1.1.3. Psychosociology

• The evaluation of psychosocial factors of the National Institute of Safety and Hygiene at Work (FPSICO) method: the F-Psico method offers information about the following risk factors: work time, autonomy, work charge, psychological demands, variety/content, participation/supervision, interest/compensation, roll performance, relationships, and social support [ 33 ].
• The COPSOQ method: this method has been designed on the basis of epidemiologic methodology and the use of standardized surveys, the participation of preventing agents in companies, and result triangulation [ 34 ].

1.2. Standardization Process

1.3. general and specific objectives, 2. materials and methods, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions.

• Few research studies are related to the standardization of work processes in the construction sector.
• There is a large number of work units subject to standardization, which makes total application to the entire existing base difficult.
• Regarding the applicable regulations, there is a diversity of texts since the laws that affect risk prevention are totally different in each country of use.
• Construction companies do not unify work methods, establishing their own methodologies as their own trademark.
• The subjectivity of the risk assessment technician when defining the level of risk existing in the work phase.
• The drafting and definition of all the execution procedures and processes of the different work units included in the reference cost base.
• The presentation of projects related to methods for the proper implementation of the processes studied within companies in the sector.
• The implementation of computer tools and applications that allow agile access to workers who execute the tasks of each of the phases in an easy and visual way.
• The reaction of specific manuals for each of the work units with graphic diagrams and summaries of the procedures to be used.
• A comparative bank of the results before and after the standardization of work processes and procedures.
• The creation of a specific coding governed by the standard with a global commitment to use and nomenclature.

Author Contributions

Data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest, abbreviations.

• Organzación Internacional del Trabajo. Casi 3 Millones de Personas Mueren por Accidentes y Enfermedades Relacionadas Con el Trabajo. 26 November 2023. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/es/resource/news/casi-3-millones-de-personas-mueren-por-accidentes-y-enfermedades (accessed on 14 July 2024).
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Ocuppational Safety and Health in Europe: State and Trends. 2023. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/OSH_in_Europe_state_trends_report_2023_en.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2024).
• Organzación Internacional del Trabajo. Indicadores y Herramientas de Datos. Available online: https://ilostat.ilo.org/es/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/ (accessed on 14 July 2024).
• C.C.O.O. Análisis de las Estadísticas de Accidentes de Trabajo y Enfermedades Profesionales en España en 2022. Available online: https://www.ccoo.es/31194e3b577c37267342180212c1b783000001.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2024).
• Europa Press—La Rioja. Muere un Trabajador de la Construcción de 38 Años en un Accidente Laboral en Haro. 1 March 2024. Available online: https://www.europapress.es/la-rioja/noticia-muere-trabajador-construccion-38-anos-accidente-laboral-haro-20240301173114.html (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Metropolitana. Herido Grave un Trabajador en las Obras del Camp Nou de Barcelona Tras una Caída. 14 March 2024. Available online: https://metropoliabierta.elespanol.com/sucesos/20240314/herido-grave-un-trabajador-en-las-obras-del-camp-nou-de-barcelona-tras-una-caida/839916015_0.html (accessed on 16 March 2024).
• Europa Press. Muere un Trabajador de la Construcción en un Accidente Laboral en Polientes. 6 November 2020. Available online: https://www.europapress.es/cantabria/noticia-muere-trabajador-construccion-accidente-laboral-polientes-20201106135048.html (accessed on 20 March 2024).
• La Provincia. Homicidios Toma Declaración a los Obreros y Compañeros de Ana, la Mujer que Murió en un Edificio en Construcción. 8 March 2024. Available online: https://www.laprovincia.es/sucesos/sucesos-en-canarias/2024/03/08/homicidios-toma-declaracion-obreros-companeros-99221022.html (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Telemadrid. Herido Muy Grave un Obrero al Caer Desde una Construcción de 8 Metros. 19 December 2023. Available online: https://www.telemadrid.es/noticias/madrid/Herido-muy-grave-un-obrero-al-caer-desde-una-construccion-de-8-metros-0-2625637454--20231219045749.html (accessed on 18 March 2024).
• Fonte Fernández, M.M. Informe Anual de Accidentes de Trabajo en España 2022. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 118-20-087-7. 2023. Available online: https://www.insst.es/noticias-insst/informe-anual-de-accidentes-de-trabajo-en-espana-2022 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Real Decreto 463/2020, de 14 de Marzo, Por el Que se Declara el Estado de Alarma Para la Gestión de la Situación de Crisis Sanitaria Ocasionada por el COVID-19. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 67, de 14 de Marzo de 2020. Available online: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2020/03/14/463/con (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• Fonte Fernández, M.M. Informe Anual de Accidentes de Trabajo en España 2021. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 118-20-087-7. 2022. Available online: https://www.insst.es/noticias-insst/informe-anual-de-accidentes-de-trabajo-en-espa%C3%B1a-2021 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Fonte Fernández, M.M. Informe Anual de Accidentes de Trabajo en España 2020. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 118-20-087-7. 2021. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/1750236/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2020.pdf/cb3d412c-4ebb-04f5-093c-79aa8a27b8fc?t=1634655396429 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• de la Orden Rivera, M.V. Informe Anual de Accidentes de Trabajo en España 2019. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 118-20-087-7. 2020. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/785254/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2019.pdf/550b6df1-a35c-437d-84fc-1cd679c044d7?t=1605797627935 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Fonte Fernández, M.M. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2018. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 871-19-079-7. 2019. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/602563/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2018/145414aa-b7b2-4944-8cab-cf2f93398b22 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• de la Orden Rivera, M.V. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2017. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 276-18-076-2. 2018. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/602563/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2017/33c92d6b-54d8-4ebb-95c2-00cd96039784 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• de la Orden Rivera, M.V. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2016. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 272-15-081-4. 2017. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/96082/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2016.pdf/a7848421-b490-45d9-b841-9972b5a2b83a?t=1605800600539 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• de la Orden Rivera, M.V. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2015. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 72-15-081-4. 2016. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/514312/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2015.pdf/ca1a8474-f978-4d4e-8b58-de59559b23d7?t=1685618459039 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• de la Orden Rivera, M.V. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2014. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 272-15-081-4. 2015. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/514312/Informe+anual+de+accidentes+de+trabajo+en+Espa%C3%B1a+2014.pdf/e58f8403-2e2f-412e-80db-a4fc55c00726?t=1685618459039 (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Funcas. España, por Encima de la Media Europea en Siniestralidad Laboral. 27 April 2022. Available online: https://www.funcas.es/prensa/espana-por-encima-de-la-media-europea-en-siniestralidad-laboral/ (accessed on 14 July 2024).
• O.A., M.P. Estrategia Española de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo, 2023–2027, Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), Madrid, Spain, NIPO (en línea): 118-23-005-5. 2023. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documentacion/material-tecnico/documentos-tecnicos/estrategia-espa%C3%B1ola-de-seguridad-y-salud-en-el-trabajo-2023-2027 (accessed on 5 March 2024).
• Estrategia de Desarrollo Sostenible 2030, Ministerio de Derechos Sociales y Agenda 2030, Madrid, España. NIPO en línea: 129-21-014-3. 2023. Available online: https://www.mdsocialesa2030.gob.es/agenda2030/index.htm (accessed on 2 March 2024).
• Heredia Morante, R.A. Análisis y Tratamiento de los Procedimientos de Trabajo en Edificación. Enfoscados. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2021. Available online: https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/126863?locale-attribute=es (accessed on 21 March 2024).
• González García, S. Juventud Desempleo y Precariedad Laboral. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, Volume 103, pp. 161–180, December 2013. Available online: https://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/10%20Juventud%20desempleo%20y%20precariedad%20laboral.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2024).
• Caballero, D. Un País sin Albañiles: España no Tiene Quien la Construya. 16 December 2019. Available online: https://www.abc.es/economia/abci-pais-sin-albaniles-espana-no-tiene-quien-construya-201912160222_noticia.html (accessed on 22 March 2024).
• Observatorio Fundación Laboral de la Construcción. La Población Joven y el Sector de la Construcción. 22 September 2022. Available online: https://www.observatoriodelaconstruccion.com/informes/detalle/la-poblacion-joven-y-el-sector-de-la-construccion-estudio-cuantitativo (accessed on 23 March 2024).
• de los Pinos, A.J.C. Nueva Metodología de Evaluación de Riesgos Laborales Adaptada a Obras de Edificación: Nivel de la Acción Preventiva. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2017. Available online: https://investigacion.ubu.es/documentos/5d5ba6f22999520e90d06469 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• Evaluación de Riesgos Laborales. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid, España, NIPO (en línea): 211-96-013-5. 1996. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/96076/Evaluacion_riesgos.pdf/1371c8cb-7321-48c0-880b-611f6f380c1d (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• Belloví, M.B.; Malagón, F.P. NTP 330: Sistema Simplificado de Evaluación de Riesgos de Accidente. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid, España, NIPO (en línea): 211-94-008-1. 2013. Available online: http://www.preventoronline.com/imagesbd/down/anex5104.PDF (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• Cuixart, S.N. NTP 601: Evaluación de las Condiciones de Trabajo: Carga Postural. Método REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment). Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid, España, NIPO (en línea): 211-03-001-0. 2003. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/326775/ntp_601.pdf/2989c14f-2280-4eef-9cb7-f195366352ba (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• Joshi, M.; Deshpande, V. An investigative sensitivity study of Ovako working posture analyzing system (OWAS). Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2022 , 24 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McAtamney, L.; Corlett, E.N. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 1993 , 24 , 91–99. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bilbao, J.P. NTP: 926: Factores Psicosociales: Metodología de Evaluación. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid, España, NIPO (en línea): 272-13-015-4. 2012. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/326775/926w.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• i Lluís, S.M.; Serrano, C.L.; Kristensen, T.S.; Martínez, S.V. NTP: 703: El Método COPSOQ (ISTAS21, PSQCAT21) de Evaluación de Riesgos Psicosociales. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT), Madrid, España. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/327446/ntp_703.pdf/2c8e594e-6330-429e-ae3d-f03d590ae087 (accessed on 25 April 2024).
• Ruiz, V.L. Modelo de Gestión Para la Prevención Integral de los Riesgos Laborales en Obras de Construcción. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2000. Available online: https://investigacion.ubu.es/documentos/5dde61742999523934667b08 (accessed on 10 April 2024).
• Camino, M.F. Modelo Para la Definición y Desarrollo de los Procedimientos de Trabajo en las Obras de Edificación. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernal, M.E.P. Descripción y Gestión de Procedimientos en Obras de Edificación. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernal, M.E.P. Modelo de Control de Costes Durante el Desarrollo de los Procesos Productivos en Obras de Edificación. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, Y.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Geng, X. Study and Action Plan on the Key Factors Influencing Unsafe Behaviors by Construction Workers. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 1973. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sankar, S.S.; Anandh, K.S.; Prasanna, K. Safety Leadership: A Catalyst for Positive Safety Climate on Construction Sites. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 1806. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, J.; Ishdorj, S.; Jeon, J.; Kim, J. Identifying Vital Factors for Enhancing Safety Communication among Foreign Construction Field Workers. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 1714. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bria, T.A.; Chen, W.T.; Muhammad, M.; Rantelembang, M.B. Analysis of Fatal Construction Accidents in Indonesia—A Case Study. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 1010. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Antoniou, F.; Agrafioti, N.F.; Aretoulis, G. ShouldWe Depend on Expert Opinion or Statistics? A Meta-Analysis of Accident-Contributing Factors in Construction. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 910. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arévalo Sarrate, C.; Tarín Martínez, J.; Lara Galera, A.L.; Galindo Aires, R.Á. Effect of Health and Safety Management Systems in the Construction Sector. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soh, J.; Jeong, J.; Jeong, J.; Lee, J. Quantitative Risk Evaluation by Building Type Based on Probability and Cost of Accidents. Buildings 2023 , 13 , 327. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Resolución de 6 de septiembre de 2023, de la Dirección General de Trabajo, por la que se registra y publica el VII Convenio colectivo general del sector de la construcción Boletín Oficial del Estado, 228, de 23 de septiembre de 2023. Available online: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2023/09/23/pdfs/BOE-A-2023-19903.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2024).
• Molinillo, M.C.G. Análisis y Desarrollo de Procedimientos de Trabajo. Cubiertas de Aleaciones Ligeras: Cubiertas de Zinc. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mesa, C.M.G. Estandarización de Procedimientos en Trabajo de Instalaciones en el Sector de la Construcción. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jordán, L.G. Desarrollo de Procedimientos de Trabajo de Climatización en Obras de Edificación. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guareño, F.J.D. Estandarización de Procedimientos de Trabajo en la Instalación de Carpinterías. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Naranjo, L.S.Q. Análisis y Estudio de los Procedimientos en la Ejecución de Tabiquería de yeso Laminado. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Domínguez, M.T. Homogenización y Estandarización de Procedimientos de Trabajos Seguros en Empresas del Sector de la edificación (Actualización 2021). Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Berdún, G.S. Análisis y Tratamiento de los Procedimientos de Trabajo en Edificación. Cerramientos y Particiones Interiores. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nicolás, M.J.R. Estandarización de Procedimientos de Trabajo Seguros en Trabajos de Vidrio y Carpintería en el Sector de la Construcción. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Deming, W. Calidad, Productividad y Competitividad: La Salida de la Crisis. España: Díaz de Santos. 1989. Available online: https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=d9WL4BMVHi8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 10 April 2024).
• Juran, J. Juran y la Planificación Para la Calidad. España: Díaz de Santos. 1990. Available online: https://books.google.com.hk/books/about/Juran_y_la_planificaci%C3%B3n_para_la_calida.html?id=4JAd6PBWfG0C&redir_esc=y (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Ishikawa, K. Introducción al Control de Calidad. España: Díaz de Santos. 1994. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=191721 (accessed on 2 March 2024).
• Kee, D. Comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA for assessing potential work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2021 , 83 , 103–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kee, D. Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 595. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Karhu, O.; Kansi, P.; Kuorinka, P.I. Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Appl. Ergon. 1977 , 8 , 199–201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• de Arellano, A.R.; Cano, J.L.B. Clasificación Sistemática de Precios Básicos, Auxiliares, y Unitarios. Dirección General de Vivienda. Consejería de Fomento y Vivienda, Sevilla, España. 2017. Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/export/drupaljda/Clasi_Sistematica_2017.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2024).
• Base de Costes de la Construcción de Andalucía 2024, Dirección General de Vivienda. Consejería de Fomento y Vivienda, Sevilla, España. Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/sites/default/files/inline-files/2024/01/03.-%20LISTADO%20DE%20PRECIOS%20UNITARIOS.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2024).
• Cardoso, V.Z. Clasificación Sistemática de los Procedimientos de Trabajo. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Heredia Morante, R.A.; del Río Merino, M.; Ros Serrano, A. The Accident Rate in the Construction Sector: A Work Proposal for Its Reduction through the Standardization of Safe Work Processes. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082399

Heredia Morante RA, del Río Merino M, Ros Serrano A. The Accident Rate in the Construction Sector: A Work Proposal for Its Reduction through the Standardization of Safe Work Processes. Buildings . 2024; 14(8):2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082399

Heredia Morante, Rafael Alberto, Mercedes del Río Merino, and Antonio Ros Serrano. 2024. "The Accident Rate in the Construction Sector: A Work Proposal for Its Reduction through the Standardization of Safe Work Processes" Buildings 14, no. 8: 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082399

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Love and badminton: China's Huang Yaqiong gets Olympic gold medal and marriage proposal

What’s better than winning an Olympic gold medal ?

How about winning a gold medal and almost immediately getting a marriage proposal?

That’s exactly what happened Friday to Huang Yaqiong , a women’s badminton player from China.

Yaqiong teamed with Zheng Siwei to win the gold medal in the badminton mixed doubles competition at the 2024 Paris Olympics , beating Kim Wonho and Jeong Naeun of South Korea (21-8, 21-11). Then, once Yaqiong went through the medal ceremony, fellow Chinese badminton player Liu Yuchen had a surprise for her. 

2024 PARIS OLYMPICS: Follow all of USA TODAY's Paris Games coverage here

Yuchen ‒ who won a silver medal in the men’s doubles competition at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics and competed in men’s doubles again during these Paris Games ‒ pulled out a ring, got down on one knee and proposed. 

Already holding flowers in her hands from the medal ceremony, Yaqiong quickly said yes. The proposal was shown on the videoboard at the Porte de la Chapelle Arena in Paris and the crowd celebrated along with the couple. 

This actually isn’t the first engagement associated with these Olympics. 

The official website of the Paris Olympics noted that Argentina men’s handball player Pablo Simonet proposed to Argentina women’s field hockey player Maria Campoy in the Olympic Village just before competition began. American swimmer Lilly King also got engaged to fiancé James Wells on the pool deck in Indianapolis at the United States Olympic swimming trials in June.

Here's a sampling of the social media reaction to the Olympic engagement of Yaqiong and Yuchen:

Congrats for the Happy Couple! 🥂 Glad that Huang Ya Qiong won the Gold Medal 🥇 Otherwise he might've had to postponed the proposal 😅 #Badminton #Paris2024 #Olympics pic.twitter.com/Yj175ILojT — Lulu ✨ (@emojiuser) August 2, 2024

Proposal in #Olympics #Paris2024 after Huang Ya Qiong got a gold medal in #Badminton Mixed Doubles. Congratulations!😍😍😍 pic.twitter.com/9wPXPR7Yht — 🌬 (@aeetesboo) August 2, 2024

Siwei Yaqiong may won the gold medal, but Yuchen won Yaqiong's heart😭💖 pic.twitter.com/TPI3NiysKf — taytayyy (@sbtmskn) August 2, 2024