dissertation paper on packaging design

• Contact & Help

Consumer response to sustainable packaging design

• Marketing and Consumer Behaviour

Research output : Thesis › internal PhD, WU

The design of more sustainable packaging is an important step towards reducing packaging’s environmental impacts. Packaging however is also the ‘silent salesman’ that provides many cues which consumers may use to make inferences about the packaged product’s expected benefits. Successful sustainable packaging should not only be environment-friendlier, but should also be an attractive option for consumers. The overall aim of this thesis is to examine how functional and aesthetical aspects of sustainable packaging design affect consumer purchase-related behaviors through inference-making processes. Chapter 1 provides the background of the thesis and describes the overarching theoretical framework. Chapter 2 presents an initial empirical test of consumer cue perception and inference-making processes by using a methodology of idiosyncratic attribute elicitation to analyse consumer response to a series of tomato soup packaging designs. The findings show that (packaging) sustainability is a highly salient association (second to convenience-related perceptions), but is only moderately important for consumer attitudes. Moreover, packaging sustainability cues inform further inference-making regarding a variety of consumer benefits such as product sustainability, price, healthiness, quality and (expected) taste. Results also show a large gap between consumer perception of packaging sustainability and experts’ life-cycle analysis outcomes. Chapter 3 examines how packaging can be actively redesigned to be more sustainable. It considers the extent to which three different sustainable redesign strategies (based on circular economy design literature) affect consumer purchase intentions, moral satisfaction, willingness-to-pay and benefit inferences. The results showed that consumers tend to prefer circular over linear strategies, and biologically circular over technically circular ones. Additionally, applying combinations of such redesign strategies leads to diminished increases in perceived sustainability, and consumers derive little additional moral satisfaction from more intensively redesigned packaging. Chapter 4 focusses on the influence of packaging sustainability in conjunction with product contents sustainability and different firm sustainability (advertisement) claims. Findings showed that consumers are more likely to infer deceptive firm intentions when firms provide environmental claims for packaged products that are only partially sustainable. For such products, consumers make both positive and negative inferences such that they positively value the improved environmental  impacts, yet at the same time negatively value the deceitful actions of the firm. The usage of advertisement puffery has both pros and cons such that it strengthens both the positives and negatives. Furthermore, drawing from centrality theories, the results also suggest that consumers tend to be more critical when only a peripheral attribute (packaging) is made sustainable versus when only a central attribute (product contents) is sustainable. Chapter 5 examines the mental associations between sustainability low strength/high gentleness benefits. The chapter investigates how overtly sustainable (vs. conventional) laundry detergent packaging affects consumer choices, depending on consumers’ intended laundry usage (strength vs. gentleness emphasis). Results show that the sustainable option is disadvantaged in consumer choices when consumers seek strength, and is preferred when they seek gentleness benefits. The perceived strength deficiency can (partially) be overcome by providing aesthetical masculinity signals through packaging design, and packaging that contains both sustainability and masculinity design cues is perceived relatively favourable in terms of perceived strength, gentleness and environment-friendliness. Lastly, Chapter 6 summarizes the main findings and discusses theoretical and practical implications. Overall, this thesis shows that (functional and aesthetical) sustainable packaging design does not merely change consumers’ (potentially inaccurate) view of that packaging’s environmental qualities, but causes consumers to make a range of inferences which affect packaged product choice. Successful sustainable packaging design should seek to reinforce those consumer inferences with positive effects and/or inhibit inferences with potential negative effects to ensure an overall attractive packaged product proposition.

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

• 10.18174/501664

Files and links

• Download PDF

Fingerprint

• Consumer Affect Social Sciences 100%
• Green Packaging Economics, Econometrics and Finance 100%
• Consumer Attitude Psychology 100%
• Human Activities Effects Social Sciences 66%
• Advertising Social Sciences 66%
• Morality Social Sciences 66%
• Willingness-to-Pay Social Sciences 33%
• Consumer Perception Social Sciences 33%

Projects per year

Sustainable Packages

Steenis, N., van Trijp, H. , van Herpen, E. & van der Lans, I.

1/11/14 → 5/11/19

Project : PhD

• Consumer Affect 100%
• Green Packaging 100%
• Advertising 66%
• Human Activities Effects 66%
• Morality 66%

T1 - Consumer response to sustainable packaging design

AU - Steenis, Nigel Desmond

N1 - WU thesis 7363 Includes bibliographical references. - With summary in English

PY - 2019/11/5

Y1 - 2019/11/5

N2 - The design of more sustainable packaging is an important step towards reducing packaging’s environmental impacts. Packaging however is also the ‘silent salesman’ that provides many cues which consumers may use to make inferences about the packaged product’s expected benefits. Successful sustainable packaging should not only be environment-friendlier, but should also be an attractive option for consumers. The overall aim of this thesis is to examine how functional and aesthetical aspects of sustainable packaging design affect consumer purchase-related behaviors through inference-making processes. Chapter 1 provides the background of the thesis and describes the overarching theoretical framework. Chapter 2 presents an initial empirical test of consumer cue perception and inference-making processes by using a methodology of idiosyncratic attribute elicitation to analyse consumer response to a series of tomato soup packaging designs. The findings show that (packaging) sustainability is a highly salient association (second to convenience-related perceptions), but is only moderately important for consumer attitudes. Moreover, packaging sustainability cues inform further inference-making regarding a variety of consumer benefits such as product sustainability, price, healthiness, quality and (expected) taste. Results also show a large gap between consumer perception of packaging sustainability and experts’ life-cycle analysis outcomes. Chapter 3 examines how packaging can be actively redesigned to be more sustainable. It considers the extent to which three different sustainable redesign strategies (based on circular economy design literature) affect consumer purchase intentions, moral satisfaction, willingness-to-pay and benefit inferences. The results showed that consumers tend to prefer circular over linear strategies, and biologically circular over technically circular ones. Additionally, applying combinations of such redesign strategies leads to diminished increases in perceived sustainability, and consumers derive little additional moral satisfaction from more intensively redesigned packaging. Chapter 4 focusses on the influence of packaging sustainability in conjunction with product contents sustainability and different firm sustainability (advertisement) claims. Findings showed that consumers are more likely to infer deceptive firm intentions when firms provide environmental claims for packaged products that are only partially sustainable. For such products, consumers make both positive and negative inferences such that they positively value the improved environmental  impacts, yet at the same time negatively value the deceitful actions of the firm. The usage of advertisement puffery has both pros and cons such that it strengthens both the positives and negatives. Furthermore, drawing from centrality theories, the results also suggest that consumers tend to be more critical when only a peripheral attribute (packaging) is made sustainable versus when only a central attribute (product contents) is sustainable. Chapter 5 examines the mental associations between sustainability low strength/high gentleness benefits. The chapter investigates how overtly sustainable (vs. conventional) laundry detergent packaging affects consumer choices, depending on consumers’ intended laundry usage (strength vs. gentleness emphasis). Results show that the sustainable option is disadvantaged in consumer choices when consumers seek strength, and is preferred when they seek gentleness benefits. The perceived strength deficiency can (partially) be overcome by providing aesthetical masculinity signals through packaging design, and packaging that contains both sustainability and masculinity design cues is perceived relatively favourable in terms of perceived strength, gentleness and environment-friendliness. Lastly, Chapter 6 summarizes the main findings and discusses theoretical and practical implications. Overall, this thesis shows that (functional and aesthetical) sustainable packaging design does not merely change consumers’ (potentially inaccurate) view of that packaging’s environmental qualities, but causes consumers to make a range of inferences which affect packaged product choice. Successful sustainable packaging design should seek to reinforce those consumer inferences with positive effects and/or inhibit inferences with potential negative effects to ensure an overall attractive packaged product proposition.

AB - The design of more sustainable packaging is an important step towards reducing packaging’s environmental impacts. Packaging however is also the ‘silent salesman’ that provides many cues which consumers may use to make inferences about the packaged product’s expected benefits. Successful sustainable packaging should not only be environment-friendlier, but should also be an attractive option for consumers. The overall aim of this thesis is to examine how functional and aesthetical aspects of sustainable packaging design affect consumer purchase-related behaviors through inference-making processes. Chapter 1 provides the background of the thesis and describes the overarching theoretical framework. Chapter 2 presents an initial empirical test of consumer cue perception and inference-making processes by using a methodology of idiosyncratic attribute elicitation to analyse consumer response to a series of tomato soup packaging designs. The findings show that (packaging) sustainability is a highly salient association (second to convenience-related perceptions), but is only moderately important for consumer attitudes. Moreover, packaging sustainability cues inform further inference-making regarding a variety of consumer benefits such as product sustainability, price, healthiness, quality and (expected) taste. Results also show a large gap between consumer perception of packaging sustainability and experts’ life-cycle analysis outcomes. Chapter 3 examines how packaging can be actively redesigned to be more sustainable. It considers the extent to which three different sustainable redesign strategies (based on circular economy design literature) affect consumer purchase intentions, moral satisfaction, willingness-to-pay and benefit inferences. The results showed that consumers tend to prefer circular over linear strategies, and biologically circular over technically circular ones. Additionally, applying combinations of such redesign strategies leads to diminished increases in perceived sustainability, and consumers derive little additional moral satisfaction from more intensively redesigned packaging. Chapter 4 focusses on the influence of packaging sustainability in conjunction with product contents sustainability and different firm sustainability (advertisement) claims. Findings showed that consumers are more likely to infer deceptive firm intentions when firms provide environmental claims for packaged products that are only partially sustainable. For such products, consumers make both positive and negative inferences such that they positively value the improved environmental  impacts, yet at the same time negatively value the deceitful actions of the firm. The usage of advertisement puffery has both pros and cons such that it strengthens both the positives and negatives. Furthermore, drawing from centrality theories, the results also suggest that consumers tend to be more critical when only a peripheral attribute (packaging) is made sustainable versus when only a central attribute (product contents) is sustainable. Chapter 5 examines the mental associations between sustainability low strength/high gentleness benefits. The chapter investigates how overtly sustainable (vs. conventional) laundry detergent packaging affects consumer choices, depending on consumers’ intended laundry usage (strength vs. gentleness emphasis). Results show that the sustainable option is disadvantaged in consumer choices when consumers seek strength, and is preferred when they seek gentleness benefits. The perceived strength deficiency can (partially) be overcome by providing aesthetical masculinity signals through packaging design, and packaging that contains both sustainability and masculinity design cues is perceived relatively favourable in terms of perceived strength, gentleness and environment-friendliness. Lastly, Chapter 6 summarizes the main findings and discusses theoretical and practical implications. Overall, this thesis shows that (functional and aesthetical) sustainable packaging design does not merely change consumers’ (potentially inaccurate) view of that packaging’s environmental qualities, but causes consumers to make a range of inferences which affect packaged product choice. Successful sustainable packaging design should seek to reinforce those consumer inferences with positive effects and/or inhibit inferences with potential negative effects to ensure an overall attractive packaged product proposition.

UR - https://edepot.wur.nl/501664

U2 - 10.18174/501664

DO - 10.18174/501664

M3 - internal PhD, WU

SN - 9789463951401

PB - Wageningen University

CY - Wageningen

Sustainable packaging design and the consumer perspective: a systematic literature review

• Review Article
• Published: 07 November 2023
• Volume 2024 , pages 77–111, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Generoso Branca   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-8822 1 ,
• Riccardo Resciniti 2 &
• Barry J. Babin 3  

1950 Accesses

5 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Sustainable packaging is gaining increasing prominence as a factor in consumer decision-making. This research aims to review and synthesise the literature addressing sustainable attributes and eco-friendly cues of consumer goods packaging. A systematic literature review was performed: 52 scientific articles published between 2010 and 2020 in peer-reviewed academic journals were included. Furthermore, a bibliometric analysis for bibliographic coupling was conducted. The review identifies four main research themes: consumers’ knowledge and understanding of sustainable packaging; studies that investigate green packaging following a holistic approach; studies employing an analytical approach to identifying relevant package cues; and consumers’ attitudes and behaviours towards eco-friendly packaging. The research integrates and enriches previous reviews analysing the topic of sustainable packaging from a different perspective. In addition, it provides a classification and rationalisation of recent articles, which the literature still lacks, bringing out relevant insights and avenues for future research. Finally, the review details the analysis of attributes and cues from an analytical point of view. Companies and practitioners may exploit the insights of this research to arrive at a sustainable packaging design effective and appreciated by consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

To Pack Sustainably or Not to Pack Sustainably? A Review of the Relationship between Consumer Behaviour and Sustainable Packaging

What Stops Designers from Designing Sustainable Packaging?—A Review of Eco-design Tools with Regard to Packaging Design

Eco-Design and Sustainable Packaging: Challenges, Trends and Perspectives in the Food Sector

Aagerup, U., Frank, A. S., & Hultqvist, E. (2019). The persuasive effects of emotional green packaging claims. British Food Journal, 121 (12), 3233–3246. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2019-0652 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Afif, K., Rebolledo, C., & Roy, J. (2022). Drivers, barriers and performance outcomes of sustainable packaging: A systematic literature review. British Food Journal, 124 (3), 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2021-0150 .

Arboretti, R., & Bordignon, P. (2016). Consumer preferences in food packaging: CUB models and conjoint analysis. British Food Journal, 118 (3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0146 .

Bangsa, A. B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2020). Linking sustainable product attributes and consumer decision-making: Insights from a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245 , 118902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118902 .

Barber, N. (2010). Green wine packaging: Targeting environmental consumers. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 22 (4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061011092447 .

Barchiesi, M. A., Castellan, S., & Costa, R. (2018). In the eye of the beholder: Communicating CSR through color in packaging design. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24 (7), 720–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1224771 .

Baruk, A. I., & Iwanicka, A. (2016). The effect of age, gender and level of education on the consumer’s expectations towards dairy product packaging. British Food Journal, 118 (1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2015-0248 .

Binninger, A. S. (2017). Perception of naturalness of food packaging and its role in consumer product evaluation. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23 (3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2014.885868 .

Boesen, S., Bey, N., & Niero, M. (2019). Environmental sustainability of liquid food packaging. Is there a gap between Danish consumers’ perception and learnings from life cycle assessment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 210 , 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.055 .

Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labelling. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28 (1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111101976 .

Branca, G., Resciniti, R., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2023). Virtual is so real! Consumers’ evaluation of product packaging in virtual reality. Psychology & Marketing, 40 , 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21743 .

Brennan, L., Langley, S., Verghese, K., Lockrey, S., Ryder, M., Francis, C., Phan-Le, N. T., & Hill, A. (2021). The role of packaging in fighting food waste: A systematised review of consumer perceptions of packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281 , 125276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125276 .

Chevtchouk, Y., Veloutsou, C., & Paton, R. A. (2021). The experience—Economy revisited: An interdisciplinary perspective and research agenda. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30 (8), 1288–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2019-2406 .

Childs, M. (2017). Brand extension feedback effects: What do we know and where should we go? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26 (7), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-01-2016-1087 .

Cho, Y. N. (2015). Different shades of green consciousness: The interplay of sustainability labeling and environmental impact on product evaluations. Journal of Business Ethics, 128 , 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2080-4 .

Cho, Y. N., & Baskin, E. (2018). It’s a match when green meets healthy in sustainability labelling. Journal of Business Research, 86 , 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.050 .

Cousté, N. L., Martos-Partal, M., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2012). The power of a package product claims drive purchase decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 52 (3), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-3-364-375 .

De Feo, G., Ferrara, C., & Francesca Minichini, F. (2022). Comparison between the perceived and actual environmental sustainability of beverage packagings in glass, plastic, and aluminium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333 , 130158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130158 .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Donato, C., Barone, A. M., & Romani, S. (2021). The satiating power of sustainability: The effect of package sustainability on perceived satiation of healthy food. British Food Journal, 123 (13), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1094 .

Donato, C., & D’Aniello, A. (2022). Tell me more and make me feel proud: The role of eco-labels and informational cues on consumers’ food perceptions. British Food Journal, 124 (4), 1365–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0416 .

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133 , 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 .

Dopico-Parada, A., López-Miguens, M. J., & Álvarez-González, P. (2021). Building value with packaging: Development and validation of a measurement scale. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63 , 102685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102685 .

Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. (2016). Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 135 , 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2491-2 .

Ertz, M., François, J., & Durif, F. (2017). How consumers react to environmental information. An experimental study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29 (3), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1273813 .

Fajardo, T. M., & Townsend, C. (2016). Where you say it matters: Why packages are a more believable source of product claims than advertisements. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.11.002 .

Felix, R., González, E. M., Castaño, R., Carrete, L., & Gretz, R. T. (2022). When the green in green packaging backfires: Gender effects and perceived masculinity of environmentally friendly products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46 , 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12738 .

Ferrara, C., Zigarelli, V., & De Feo, G. (2020). Attitudes of a sample of consumers towards more sustainable wine packaging alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271 , 122581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122581 .

Fink, A. (2009). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (3rd ed.). Sage.

Google Scholar  

Ghaffar, A., Islam, T., Khan, H., Kincl, T., & Sharma, A. (2023). A sustainable retailer’s journey to sustainable practices: Prioritizing the customer and the planet. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74 , 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103388 .

Gosselt, J. F., van Rompay, T., & Haske, L. (2019). Won’t get fooled again: The effects of internal and external CSR ECO-Labeling. Journal of Business Ethics, 155 , 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3512-8 .

Granato, G., Fischer, A. H. R., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2022). The price of sustainability: How consumers trade-off conventional packaging benefits against sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365 , 132739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132739 .

Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2012). Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36 (6), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01045.x .

Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging. A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194 (1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.106 .

Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., & Ramme, I. (2020). How green is your packaging–A comparative international study of cues consumers use to recognize environmentally friendly packaging. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44 (3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12560 .

Herédia-Colaço, V. (2023). Pro-environmental messages have more effect when they come from less familiar brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32 (3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2021-3782 .

Jerzyk, E. (2016). Design and communication of ecological content on sustainable packaging in young consumers’ opinions. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22 (6), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2015.1121435 .

Karana, E. (2012). Characterization of ‘natural’ and ‘high-quality’ materials to improve perception of bio-plastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37 , 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.034 .

Kemper, J. A., & Ballantine, P. W. (2019). What do we mean by sustainability marketing? Journal of Marketing Management, 35 (3–4), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1573845 .

Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2020). Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging–A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254 , 120123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123 .

Kitz, R., Walker, T., Charlebois, S., & Music, J. (2022). Food packaging during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consumer perceptions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46 , 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12691 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Koch, J., Frommeyer, B., & Schewe, G. (2022). Managing the transition to eco-friendly packaging—An investigation of consumers’ motives in online retail. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351 , 131504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131504 .

Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging. Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37 , 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.009 .

Lindh, H., Olsson, A., & Williams, H. (2016). Consumer perceptions of food packaging: Contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development? Packaging Technology and Science, 29 , 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2184 .

Lindh, H., Williams, H., Olsson, A., & Wikström, F. (2016). Elucidating the indirect contributions of packaging to sustainable development. A terminology of packaging functions and features. Packaging Technology and Science, 29 (4–5), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2197 .

Lisboa, A., Vitorino, L., & Antunes, R. (2022). Gen Zers’ intention to purchase products with sustainable packaging: An alternative perspective to the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Marketing Management, 38 (9–10), 967–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2083214 .

Louis, D., Lombart, C., & Durif, F. (2021). Packaging-free products: A lever of proximity and loyalty between consumers and grocery stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60 , 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102499 .

Lu, S., Yang, L., Liu, W., & Jia, L. (2020). User preference for electronic commerce overpackaging solutions: Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258 , 120936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120936 .

Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015). Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of eco-designed packaging. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43 (4/5), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2014-0048 .

Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44 , 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005 .

Magnier, L., Schoormans, J., & Mugge, R. (2016). Judging a product by its cover. Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products. Food Quality and Preference, 53 , 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006 .

Mai, L. W. (2014). Consumers’ willingness to pay for ethical attribute. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32 (6), 706–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2013-0139 .

Mancini, P., Marchini, A., & Simeone, M. (2017). Which are the sustainable attributes affecting the real consumption behaviour? Consumer understanding and choices. British Food Journal, 119 , 1839–1853. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0574 .

Molina-Besch, K. (2016). Prioritization guidelines for green food packaging development. British Food Journal, 118 (10), 2512–2533. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2015-0462 .

Monnot, E., Parguel, B., & Reniou, F. (2015). Consumer responses to elimination of overpackaging on private label products. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43 (4/5), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2014-0036 .

Monnot, E., Reniou, F., Parguel, B., & Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. (2019). Thinking outside the packaging box: Should brands consider store shelf context when eliminating overpackaging? Journal of Business Ethics, 154 , 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3439-0 .

Nguyen, A. T., Parker, L., Brennan, L., & Lockrey, S. (2020). A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252 , 119792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792 .

Nordin, N., & Selke, S. (2010). Social aspect of sustainable packaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 23 (6), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.899 .

Norton, N., Oloyede, O. O., Lignou, S., Wang, Q. J., Vásquez, G., & Alexi, N. (2023). Understanding consumers’ sustainability knowledge and behaviour towards food packaging to develop tailored consumer-centric engagement campaigns: A Greece and the United Kingdom perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408 , 137169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137169 .

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10 , 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Pancer, E., McShane, L., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2017). Isolated environmental cues and product efficacy penalties: The color green and eco-labels. Journal of Business Ethics, 143 , 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2764-4 .

Prakash, G., Choudhary, S., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Khan, S. A. R., & Panda, T. K. (2019). Do altruistic and egoistic values influence consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions towards eco-friendly packaged products? An empirical investigation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50 , 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.011 .

Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India. A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141 , 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116 .

Qayyum, A., Jamil, R. A., & Sehar, A. (2022). Impact of green marketing, greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC . https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2022-0032 .

Rees, W., Tremma, O., & Manning, L. (2019). Sustainability cues on packaging: The influence of recognition on purchasing behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235 , 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.217 .

Resciniti, R. (2020). 2020: A new Journal for a true marketing. Italian Journal of Marketing . https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00007-4 .

Ruokamo, E., Räisänen, M., & Kauppi, S. (2022). Consumer preferences for recycled plastics: Observations from a citizen survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379 (2), 134720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134720 .

Scott, L., & Vigar-Ellis, D. (2014). Consumer understanding, perceptions and behaviours with regard to environmentally friendly packaging in a developing nation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38 (6), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12136 .

Sekki, S., Kauppinen-Räisänen, H., Kylkilahti, E., & Autio, M. (2023). Packaging journey from retail to home: How the meaning of sustainability for colour transforms. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51 (13), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2021-0579 .

Seo, J., & Scammon, D. (2017). Do green packages lead to misperceptions? The influence of package colors on consumers’ perceptions of brands with environmental claims. Marketing Letters, 28 , 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9420-y .

Shimul, A. S., & Cheah, I. (2023). Consumers’ preference for eco-friendly packaged products: Pride vs guilt appeal. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41 (2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2022-0197 .

Singh, G., & Pandey, N. (2018). The determinants of green packaging that influence buyers’ willingness to pay a price premium. Australasian Marketing Journal, 26 (3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.06.001 .

Skard, S., Jørgensen, S., & Pedersen, L. J. T. (2020). When is sustainability a liability, and when is it an asset? Quality inferences for core and peripheral attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 173 , 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04415-1 .

Smith, K. T., & Brower, T. R. (2012). Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20 (6), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2012.711345 .

Spack, J. A., Board, V. E., Crighton, L. M., Kostka, P. M., & Ivory, J. D. (2012). It’s easy being green: The effects of argument and imagery on consumer responses to green product packaging. Environmental Communication, 6 (4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.706231 .

Steenis, N. D., van der Lans, I. A., van Herpen, E., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2018). Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205 , 854–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.137 .

Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017). Consumer response to packaging design. The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162 , 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 .

Su, D. N., Duong, T. H., Dinh, M. T. T., Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., & Johnson, L. W. (2021). Behavior towards shopping at retailers practicing sustainable grocery packaging: The influences of intra-personal and retailer-based contextual factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279 , 123683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123683 .

Tran Dinh, M. T., Su, D. N., Tran, K. T., Luu, T. T., Duong, T. H., & Johnson, L. W. (2022). Eco-designed retail packaging: The empirical conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379 (2), 134717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134717 .

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Palminder, S. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by mean of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 .

Trivedi, R. H., Patel, J. D., & Acharya, N. (2018). Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196 , 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.024 .

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 .

Venter, K., van der Merwe, D., de Beer, H., Kempen, E., & Bosman, M. (2011). Consumers’ perceptions of food packaging. An exploratory investigation in Potchefstroom, South Africa. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35 (3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00936.x .

Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4), 629–635.

Wei, W., Kim, G., Miao, L., Behnke, C., & Almanza, B. (2018). Consumer inferences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims on packaged foods. Journal of Business Research, 83 , 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.046 .

Wikström, F., Verghese, K., Auras, R., Olsson, A., Williams, H., Wever, R., Grönman, K., Kvalvåg Pettersen, M., Møller, H., & Soukka, R. (2018). Packaging strategies that save food: A research agenda for 2030. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23 (3), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12769 .

Williams, H., Lindström, A., Trischler, J., Wikström, F., & Rowe, Z. (2020). Avoiding food becoming waste in households—The role of packaging in consumers’ practices across different food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265 , 121775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121775 .

Williams, H., Wikström, F., Otterbring, T., Löfgren, M., & Gustafsson, A. (2012). Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24 , 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.044 .

Wood, S., Robinson, S., & Poor, M. (2018). The efficacy of green package cues for mainstream versus niche brands. How mainstream green brands can suffer at the shelf. Journal of Advertising Research, 58 (2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-025 .

Zeng, T. (2022). Impacts of consumers’ perceived risks in eco-design packaging on food wastage behaviors. British Food Journal, 124 (8), 2512–2532. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0603 .

Zeng, T., Deschênes, J., & Durif, F. (2020). Eco-design packaging: An epistemological analysis and transformative research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276 , 123361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123361 .

Zeng, T., & Durif, F. (2020). The impact of eco-design packaging on food waste avoidance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Promotion Management, 26 (5), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2020.1729320 .

Zeng, T., Durif, F., & Robinot, E. (2021). Can eco-design packaging reduce consumer food waste? An experimental study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162 , 120342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120342 .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy

Generoso Branca

Professor of International Management and Marketing, Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy

Riccardo Resciniti

Phil B. Hardin Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, Analytics, and Professional Sales, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Barry J. Babin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Generoso Branca .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 31.9 kb)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Branca, G., Resciniti, R. & Babin, B.J. Sustainable packaging design and the consumer perspective: a systematic literature review. Ital. J. Mark. 2024 , 77–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-023-00084-1

Download citation

Received : 17 February 2022

Accepted : 22 October 2023

Published : 07 November 2023

Issue Date : March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-023-00084-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Sustainability
• Eco-friendly
• Green marketing
• Consumer decision making
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• DSpace@MIT Home
• MIT Libraries
• Graduate Theses

Sustainable packaging approaches for current waste challenges

Other Contributors

Terms of use, description, date issued, collections.

Show Statistical Information

The art of packaging: An investigation into the role of color in packaging, marketing, and branding

• December 2014
• International Journal of Organizational Leadership 3(2):92-102
• 3(2):92-102
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Tulus Martua Sihombing
• Iryanti Adriant
• Abdul Hakeem Alfaridzi Dharma Kesuma
• Maya Putri Utami

• MULTIMED TOOLS APPL

• Maria Grazia Cardinali

• K Chandrasekhar

• PHYSIOL BEHAV

• CRIT REV FOOD SCI
• Jenneke Heising

• APPL LINGUIST

• Market Theor

• Int J Consum Stud

• PACKAG TECHNOL SCI

• Raghav Prashant Sundar

• EUR J MARKETING

• Nayanika Singh
• S. K. Srivastava
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up